Furthermore, it has already had occasion to   address complaints related to alleged breach of one’s right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against the Slovak Republic (see, for example, Kuril

KRAWCZAK 04/10/2005 04/01/2006 34097/96 KREPS 26/07/2001 26/10/2001 12786/02 KROWIAK 16/10/2007 16/01/2008 38018/07 KRZYSZTOFIAK 20/04/2010 20/07/2010 16535/02 KUBICZ 28/03/2006 28/06/2006 12848/03 KUBIK

Furthermore, it has already had occasion to   address complaints related to alleged breach of one’s right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against the Slovak Republic (see, for example, Kuril

Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one’s right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against the Slovak Republic (see, for example, Kuril

Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one’s right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against the Slovak Republic (see, for example, Kuril

Ukraine (dec.), no. 64284/14, § 19, 17 October 2024; contrast Kulyk v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 40214/16, §§ 17 and 20, 9 May 2025). 19.

In the case of Kuliś v.

) in respect of whom the limits of critical comment are wider, as they are inevitably and knowingly exposed to public scrutiny and must therefore display a particularly high degree of tolerance (see Kuliś

In the case of Kulyk v.

In the case of Kulák v.

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Kulida v. Russia, no. 44049/09, 17 June 2014, Dimov v.

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Kulida v. Russia, no. 44049/09, 17 June 2014, Dimov v.

Finland (no. 47628/06) Arkadiusz Kubik v. Poland (no. 45097/05) Górkiewicz v. Poland (no. 41663/04) Kliber v. Poland (no. 11522/03) Makuszewski v. Poland (no. 35556/05) Pelizg v.

Furthermore, it has already had occasion to   address complaints related to alleged breach of one’s right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against the Slovak Republic (see, for example, Kuril

RADOVIĆ 1961 Jusuf MUHOVIĆ 1944 Momčilo JOKIĆ 1958 Draško BUKILIĆ 1952 Milorad BAJIĆ 1949 Ruždija TALJANOVIĆ 1950 Zlatana SMOLOVIĆ 1947 Milenko RADONJIĆ 1979 Zoran POPOVIĆ 1966 Marta MIRANOVIĆ 1949 Milka KULIĆ

Pologne (n o 3501/02) Kuril c. Slovaquie (n o 63959/00)     ***   Rédigés par le greffe, ces résumés ne lient pas la Cour.

xa0;       77803/16 09/12/2016 Stanisław KANIA 24/06/1989 Warszawa   PLN 9,860             77813/16 09/12/2016 Łukasz KUBIAK

17/05/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 5,000   55450/21 08/11/2021 Polina Alekseyevna KURILO

NO. 5 13/10/2009 13/01/2010 56161/00 KOMANICKÝ NO.2 02/10/2007 02/01/2008 25951/06 KOMAR 26/10/2010   11051/06 KOSICKÝ AND OTHERS 11/01/2011   29749/05 KUČERA 15/12/2009 15/03/2010 63959/00 KURIL

  10493/12, §   45, 27   November 2014; Kulik v. Ukraine , no.   10397/10, §   59, 19   March 2015; and Yaroshovets and Others v. Ukraine , nos.