CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

6 954 résultats pour « Samir Lassoued »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1020JUD000570102

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2005

20 octobre 2005

It thus lasted more than 4 years and 4   months.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0626DEC001999492

Admin. suprême

26 juin 1996

26 juin 1996

  On the same day, the Presiding Judge of the Court of Assizes dismissed this request for the same reasons as given in his decision of 26 March 1992.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0201DEC002352302

Admin. suprême

1 février 2005

1 février 2005

At the same time it was emphasised that the two Swedish nationals, who had been convicted by the same City Court, were to be heard as witnesses on the prosecution's behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0117DEC002617195

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 1997

17 janvier 1997

  On the same day the court dismissed his request.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0412JUD001525902

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2005

12 avril 2005

It has thus lasted more than twenty one years. 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0218JUD004390107

Admin. suprême

18 février 2014

18 février 2014

The applicants also complained under the same provision that the proceedings had been unfair, in particular in so far as different panels of the same Court of Appeal of Cluj-Napoca adopted conflicting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1103JUD000576605

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2009

3 novembre 2009

It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article   29 § 3). THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927DEC004234106

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2011

27 septembre 2011

She also complained under the same provisions that the compensation awarded to her in the framework of those proceedings was insufficient. THE LAW 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0510DEC000565904

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2011

10 mai 2011

By the same judgment, the applicant’s civil action was disjoined on the ground that the establishment of the final amount to be granted to the applicant as damages might delay the criminal proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913DEC006355613

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2016

13 septembre 2016

    On 23 November 2009 the enforcement creditor instituted the second set of enforcement proceedings before the Poreč Municipal Court against the applicant for the same debt.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13125

Admin. suprême

9 février 2021

9 février 2021

The longer the pre-trial detention lasted, the more substantiation was required for convincingly demonstrating that the alleged risk or risks in case of the suspect’s release.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13129

Admin. suprême

9 février 2021

9 février 2021

The longer the pre-trial detention lasted, the more substantiation was required for convincingly demonstrating that the alleged risk or risks in case of the suspect’s release.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0228DEC002291620

Admin. suprême

28 février 2023

28 février 2023

The applicant was not subjected to any restriction as regards his visiting rights hence his visitors and lawyer were able to visit him within the same period.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1202DEC003845404

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2008

2 décembre 2008

The length of applicant’s pre-trial detention between 1997 and 2001 and his right to challenge its lawfulness during the same period were the subject of his first application with the Court ( Tanko Todorov

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13127

Admin. suprême

9 février 2021

9 février 2021

The longer the pre-trial detention lasted, the more substantiation was required for convincingly demonstrating that the alleged risk or risks in case of the suspect’s release.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0120JUD002198006

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2011

20 janvier 2011

At approximately the same time custody proceedings were opened before the same court under file no. 5 F 283/98.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0327JUD005796300

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2007

27 mars 2007

On the same day, the deceased's brother, İ.Y., joined the proceedings as a civil party ( müdahil ).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0125DEC004278302

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2005

25 janvier 2005

As concerned the promissory note loan, the same type of agreement had been followed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0125DEC004276802

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2005

25 janvier 2005

As concerned the promissory note loan, the same type of agreement had been followed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0125DEC004266502

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2005

25 janvier 2005

As concerned the promissory note loan, the same type of agreement had been followed.

Source officielle

Page 20 sur 348

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.