CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1020JUD000570102
20 octobre 2005
It thus lasted more than 4 years and 4   months.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0626DEC001999492
26 juin 1996
  On the same day, the Presiding Judge of the Court of Assizes dismissed this request for the same reasons as given in his decision of 26 March 1992.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0201DEC002352302
1 février 2005
At the same time it was emphasised that the two Swedish nationals, who had been convicted by the same City Court, were to be heard as witnesses on the prosecution's behalf.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0117DEC002617195
17 janvier 1997
  On the same day the court dismissed his request.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0412JUD001525902
12 avril 2005
It has thus lasted more than twenty one years. 17.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0218JUD004390107
18 février 2014
The applicants also complained under the same provision that the proceedings had been unfair, in particular in so far as different panels of the same Court of Appeal of Cluj-Napoca adopted conflicting
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1103JUD000576605
3 novembre 2009
It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article   29 § 3). THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927DEC004234106
27 septembre 2011
She also complained under the same provisions that the compensation awarded to her in the framework of those proceedings was insufficient. THE LAW 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0510DEC000565904
10 mai 2011
By the same judgment, the applicant’s civil action was disjoined on the ground that the establishment of the final amount to be granted to the applicant as damages might delay the criminal proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913DEC006355613
13 septembre 2016
    On 23 November 2009 the enforcement creditor instituted the second set of enforcement proceedings before the Poreč Municipal Court against the applicant for the same debt.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13125
9 février 2021
The longer the pre-trial detention lasted, the more substantiation was required for convincingly demonstrating that the alleged risk or risks in case of the suspect’s release.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13129
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0228DEC002291620
28 février 2023
The applicant was not subjected to any restriction as regards his visiting rights hence his visitors and lawyer were able to visit him within the same period.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1202DEC003845404
2 décembre 2008
The length of applicant’s pre-trial detention between 1997 and 2001 and his right to challenge its lawfulness during the same period were the subject of his first application with the Court ( Tanko Todorov
ECLI:CEDH:002-13127
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0120JUD002198006
20 janvier 2011
At approximately the same time custody proceedings were opened before the same court under file no. 5 F 283/98.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0327JUD005796300
27 mars 2007
On the same day, the deceased's brother, İ.Y., joined the proceedings as a civil party ( müdahil ).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0125DEC004278302
25 janvier 2005
As concerned the promissory note loan, the same type of agreement had been followed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0125DEC004276802
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0125DEC004266502
Page 20 sur 348
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.