does not apply to proceedings regulating a person’s citizenship, as a right to citizenship is not a civil right, given that it is not of a pecuniary or otherwise of a private character (see Sergey Smirnov

31/01/2021 and on 10/03/2021 were each time executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 6,000     43612/21 14/08/2021 Aleksandr Engelsovich SMIRNOV

of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. 3,500   49646/19 18/09/2019 Levon Leonidovich SMIRNOV

Smirnov, with nine high-ranking police officers (Police Colonels P. Saprykin, Y. Zdorenko, A.   Kuznetsov, V. Yermakov, A. Kasatkin, A. Dvoynos, Police Lieutenant-Colonel A.

They argued that the present case was similar to that of Aleksandr Smirnov v.

The article was signed by his pen name Sergey Smirnov.

the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   47844/21 08/09/2021 Denis Yuryevich SMIRNOV

  Russia , no. 62936/00, §   247, 9   October 2008; Andrey   Smirnov v.   Russia , no. 43149/10, § 38, 13   February 2018; and Resin , cited above, § 24).

It did not offer adequate and effective safeguards against abuse (see, for example, Smirnov v. Russia , no. 71362/01, §§ 44-45, 7 June 2007). 57.

proceedings before a court, constitutes one aspect; however, it is an aspect that makes it in fact possible to benefit from the further guarantees laid down in paragraph   1 of Article 6 (see Sergey Smirnov

For the Government, the situation in the first applicant’s case was comparable to that in Aleksandr Smirnov v. Ukraine (no. 38683/06, 15   July 2010).

Russia , nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012, related to conditions of pre-trial and post ‑ conviction detention; Andrey Smirnov v.

observers during the search in order to ensure that materials subject to professional secrecy were not removed (see Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH , cited above, § 57, with further references, and Smirnov

proceedings before a court, constitutes one aspect; however, it is an aspect that makes it in fact possible to benefit from the further guarantees laid down in paragraph   1 of Article 6 (see Sergey Smirnov

  Finland , no. 56720/09, § 33, 15 February 2011, as regards searches in business premises; Smirnov v.

dans les temps de son remplacement ; 10°) qu'elle fait état du retrait de la mission de formateur SMPRO au cours de l'année 2005, mais que cette mission était liée au statut de cadre et s'est terminée

    The Court will take into account only the claim which the applicant submitted within the time-limit set for that purpose (see, mutatis mutandis , Smirnov   v. Russia , no.

Petrenko, Smirnov and 2 others (cellmates) 20/09/2012 Extract from the patient’s medical file Deputy Head of Medical Treatment and Prevention Issues Unit of IK-5.

  Allemagne , n o   41604/98, § 45, CEDH 2005 ‑ IV; Smirnov c.

tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Moscow City Court, 06/11/2019. 4,000   27641/20 25/06/2020 Pavel Vladimirovich SMIRNOV