CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248997
4 février 2026
Invoking Article 13 of the Convention, all the applicants also complain that they did not have effective domestic remedies in respect of their Convention complaints.
Page 20 sur 799
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0711DEC007303301
11 juillet 2006
(Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention).
ECLI:CEDH:001-230863
9 janvier 2024
The applicants complain, under Article 6 of the Convention, about their lack of access to the Constitutional Court.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0206JUD000412818
6 février 2025
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 of the Convention 8. The applicants complained principally of the various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0903DEC004442704
3 septembre 2020
The applicants also raised other complaints under various provisions of the Convention and its Protocols. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0412DEC000041706
12 avril 2011
He further brought numerous complaints under Articles 3, 6, 7, 8 and 14 of the Convention. THE LAW A. Complaint under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention 28.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0606DEC004635219
6 juin 2024
The case concerns the applicant’s dismissal from the cyber police allegedly in breach of Article 8 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113DEC002485006
13 janvier 2015
The applicants also made accessory complaints under various Articles of the Convention. THE LAW A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0612JUD002091918
12 juin 2025
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.
ECLI:CEDH:001-223238
24 janvier 2023
The applications raise issues under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention and Articles 13 and 35 § 1 of the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0615DEC000341304
15 juin 2017
Finally, some applicants also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-2439523-2632469
29 juillet 2008
Il invoquait l’article 6 § 1 (droit à un procès équitable) de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme et l’article 4 du Protocole n o 7 (droit à ne pas être jugé ou puni
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1201DEC001596207
1 décembre 2016
Remaining complaints The applicants in applications nos. 15962/07 and 51907/07 also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122DEC002149404
22 novembre 2011
In a few cases they also raised grievances under Articles 6 and 14 of the Convention. THE LAW 1.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0915JUD000473706
15 septembre 2011
There has accordingly been a violation of the procedural limb of Article 2 of the Convention. II. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 58.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127DEC000618207
27 janvier 2015
6 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925DEC004196905
25 septembre 2018
The applicants complained under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention that the domestic courts had not provided good reasons for reading-out of the pre-trial statements of the witnesses
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927DEC003084205
27 septembre 2011
Relying on Article 6 § 3 c) of the Convention he complains that from 29 March to 17 June 2004 he did not have any contact with his defence lawyer. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0308DEC002408603
8 mars 2011
He further brings numerous complaints under various other Articles of the Convention. THE LAW 47.
ECLI:CEDH:001-235994
28 août 2024
The applicant complains under Articles 8 and 13 of the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.