When she informed court staff, they isolated these three jurors until the trial judge had questioned each of them individually.

, that they were discriminated against because of their nationality, that they were deported in a manner which prevented them from lodging an application with the Court before their deportation, that their

The applicants and their families then moved to Diyarbakır where they currently live.

They had also confirmed that their leader, S., had tried to oblige them to fight, but denied that they had had the intention to participate in any attacks.

When their building was hit with bullets they were not hurt, as at that time they were taking shelter in the basement of their house. Although they telephoned the police, no help was given to them.

” ) sued the applicants at the Shevchenkivsky District Court (Kyiv) seeking a ruling that they had lost their right to occupy the flat as they had not lived there for the past six months without any valid

The respective decisions were never served on any of them, and they were only notified of them when the first applicant visited the Grozny prosecutor’s office.

Having won on that point, it now suits them to take a contrary position in order to recover their costs, by contending that the provision does not apply to these proceedings and should not be given the

The security forces had not destroyed the applicants’ village or forced them to leave their homes.

  The applicants state that contrary to the law they were in no way associated to these proceedings and that they learnt thereof only when construction work started on the land, the new owners having

    The applicants objected to these decisions and requested their annulment. 9.

They also claimed that there was no evidence to rebut the presumption that they were innocent of Mr Bultó’s murder, as the physical violence to which they had been subjected rendered their confessions

    According to the applicants, once they got into the car, the officers told them that they were under arrest and started to beat them.

During the transfer and their detention they were tortured.

In view of the very serious tensions between the parties, this would unsettle them and make them feel not to know where they belong.

Following the imposition of the round-the-clock curfew on 11 December 2015, they became unable to leave their home and they were cut off from the outside world.

It noted that this evidence showed that the police had ordered the members of the group intercepted by them to put down the objects that they were holding in their hands and lie down on the ground, which

d'appel a violé, par refus d'application, les articles 1101 et 1134 du code civil ; 2°/ qu'un fait non contesté doit être considéré comme avéré par le juge ; qu'en jugeant que « rien ne démontre la thèse

Furthermore, they highlighted that the applicants had been obliged to leave Sweden together with their daughters already in 2002 and then again in 2005.

  This view was expressed by the children's doctor. However, returning them to the United Kingdom would entail separation from their father.