CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213JUD003500205
13 décembre 2011
ex officio action, on the basis of the information available to them, with a view to honouring the judgment against the State ( ibid , § 22). 19.
Page 21 sur 80
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1113JUD002079707
13 novembre 2018
On 21 June 2006, in its final hearing, the court ruled against the applicant on the basis of the expert report in question.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0203DEC002002404
3 février 2009
He submits also that on one occasion he did not receive timely medical care and on another occasion he was not promptly taken to a dentist.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0226JUD002308107
26 février 2015
They submitted that they were unable to quantify the damage sustained and requested the Court to rule on an equitable basis. 30.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1003JUD001529320
3 octobre 2024
Therefore, the measures previously indicated to the Government of Greece under Rule 39 cease to have any basis. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0511JUD004990299
11 mai 2004
It rejected the applicant’s argument that the compensation should be calculated on a daily basis.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1019DEC006066500
19 octobre 2004
Moreover, the first applicant and her husband had sent money to Eritrea on a regular basis, initially through a courier as bank transactions were impossible.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0413JUD007547001
13 avril 2006
On the basis of the foregoing, being governed by Section 27 (2) of the Federal Law on Enforcement Proceedings, decided that: 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1115DEC003950706
15 novembre 2011
On 21 January 2000, on the basis of that agreement the care home determined the sum which the applicant had to pay for his board. The Prešov Regional Office upheld that decision. 8.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2232398-2392876
17 janvier 2008
Concerning the adequacy of the judicial remedies The Court observed that there had been lengthy periods of inactivity in the criminal investigation and that basic investigative measures,
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0903DEC003450516
3 septembre 2024
On 31 October 2012, the Niš Basic Court dismissed the applicant’s claim.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD001608604
15 janvier 2015
The applicant complained under Articles 6, 13 and 14 of the Convention that the judgment in his favour had not been enforced in a timely manner.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0618JUD005047408
18 juin 2013
However, it emphasises that the existence of a sanction system is not enough if it is not applied in a timely and effective manner.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD002658608
28 novembre 2017
The Government submitted that Mr R.’s medical condition had been diagnosed in a timely fashion; that his tuberculosis treatment had started fifteen days after the diagnosis; and that his
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925DEC005804310
25 septembre 2018
That order was issued on the basis of (i) section 159 of the Territorial and Planning Act and (ii) a prior act ( констативен акт ) issued by the authorities on 11 June 1996
Pôle 4 - Chambre 5
686611de957d68b57534e36c
2 juillet 2025
Greffière, lors des débats : Mme Tiffany CASCIOLI ARRÊT : - par défaut; - par mise à disposition de l'arrêt au greffe de la Cour, délibéré initialement prévu le 28 mai 2025 et prorogé jusqu'au
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0223DEC003173796
23 février 1999
Later the applicants had allegedly found a letter, dated 24 November 1987, which stated that F. had acted on the basis of the legal advice given by M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1016JUD005491713
16 octobre 2018
The Government lastly submitted that the judgment of 27 November 2012 convicting A.G. had been transferred for execution in a timely manner.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1004JUD004772908
4 octobre 2011
He also complained that the court had confirmed his conviction only on the basis of the transcripts of the taped conversations, without listening to the actual recordings. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110JUD005642518
10 novembre 2022
She relied on section 264(1)(2) of the Criminal Procedure Law as the legal basis for the applicant’s arrest (see paragraph 29 below).