CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

1 582 résultats pour « Basile DE TIMARY »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213JUD003500205

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2011

13 décembre 2011

ex officio action, on the basis of the information available to them, with a view to honouring the judgment against the State ( ibid , § 22). 19.

Page 21 sur 80

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1113JUD002079707

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2018

13 novembre 2018

    On 21 June 2006, in its final hearing, the court ruled against the applicant on the basis of the expert report in question.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0203DEC002002404

Admin. suprême

3 février 2009

3 février 2009

He submits also that on one occasion he did not receive timely medical care and on another occasion he was not promptly taken to a dentist.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0226JUD002308107

Admin. suprême

26 février 2015

26 février 2015

They submitted that they were unable to quantify the damage sustained and requested the Court to rule on an equitable basis. 30.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1003JUD001529320

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2024

3 octobre 2024

Therefore, the measures previously indicated to the Government of Greece under Rule 39 cease to have any basis. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0511JUD004990299

Admin. suprême

11 mai 2004

11 mai 2004

    It rejected the applicant’s argument that the compensation should be calculated on a daily basis.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1019DEC006066500

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2004

19 octobre 2004

Moreover, the first applicant and her husband had sent money to Eritrea on a regular basis, initially through a courier as bank transactions were impossible.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0413JUD007547001

Admin. suprême

13 avril 2006

13 avril 2006

On the basis of the foregoing, being governed by Section 27 (2) of the Federal Law on Enforcement Proceedings, decided that: 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1115DEC003950706

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2011

15 novembre 2011

On 21 January 2000, on the basis of that agreement the care home determined the sum which the applicant had to pay for his board. The Prešov Regional Office upheld that decision. 8.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2232398-2392876

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2008

17 janvier 2008

  Concerning the adequacy of the judicial remedies   The Court observed that there had been lengthy periods of inactivity in the criminal investigation and that basic investigative measures,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0903DEC003450516

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2024

3 septembre 2024

    On 31 October 2012, the Niš Basic Court dismissed the applicant’s claim.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD001608604

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2015

15 janvier 2015

    The applicant complained under Articles   6, 13 and 14 of the Convention that the judgment in his favour had not been enforced in a timely manner.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0618JUD005047408

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2013

18 juin 2013

However, it emphasises that the existence of a sanction system is not enough if it is not applied in a timely and effective manner.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD002658608

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2017

28 novembre 2017

    The Government submitted that Mr R.’s medical condition had been diagnosed in a timely fashion; that his tuberculosis treatment had started fifteen days after the diagnosis; and that his

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925DEC005804310

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2018

25 septembre 2018

That order was issued on the basis of (i)     section 159 of the Territorial and Planning Act and (ii)     a prior act ( констативен акт ) issued by the authorities on 11 June 1996

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 4 - Chambre 5

686611de957d68b57534e36c

Appel

2 juillet 2025

2 juillet 2025

Greffière, lors des débats : Mme Tiffany CASCIOLI ARRÊT : - par défaut; - par mise à disposition de l'arrêt au greffe de la Cour, délibéré initialement prévu le 28 mai 2025 et prorogé jusqu'au

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0223DEC003173796

Admin. suprême

23 février 1999

23 février 1999

  Later the applicants had allegedly found a letter, dated 24 November 1987, which stated that F. had acted on the basis of the legal advice given by M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1016JUD005491713

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2018

16 octobre 2018

    The Government lastly submitted that the judgment of 27 November 2012 convicting A.G. had been transferred for execution in a timely manner.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1004JUD004772908

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2011

4 octobre 2011

He also complained that the court had confirmed his conviction only on the basis of the transcripts of the taped conversations, without listening to the actual recordings. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110JUD005642518

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2022

10 novembre 2022

She relied on section 264(1)(2) of the Criminal Procedure Law as the legal basis for the applicant’s arrest (see paragraph 29 below).

Source officielle