CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0628JUD001176185
28 juin 1990
The conciliation board’s decision shall be final." The conciliation board operates as a labour court. (c) The dismissal of disabled persons 47.
Page 21 sur 368
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108DEC003072905
8 novembre 2016
; vertical-align:middle } .s6A269875 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0405DEC001611590
5 avril 1995
During the hearing the Board heard three witnesses. On 7 October 1983 the Water Board rendered its judgment.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0308REP001381188
8 mars 1994
On 6 October 1976 the Supreme Land Reform Board (Oberster Agrarsenat) partially allowed the applicant's appeal.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0708DEC001391388
8 juillet 1991
Exemptions could be granted by the County Administrative Board or by the Building Committee.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1023JUD006504001
23 octobre 2007
Report by the Social Welfare Board 27.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0827DEC000293507
27 août 2013
On 24 March 2005 the Arbitration Board rejected the applicant’s objection, adopting the reasoning of the Executive Board. 17.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1004JUD000637908
4 octobre 2011
On 7 December 2005 the Supreme Land Reform Board (Oberster Agrarsenat) amended the Regional Board’s decision as regards one particular easement, but dismissed the remainder of the appeals
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0110JUD004341809
10 janvier 2013
The applicant lodged an appeal with the Higher Mental Health Board against the Mental Health Board’s decision of 7 July 2008.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-292
10 novembre 2011
He unsuccessfully appealed against the disciplinary board’s decision.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0909DEC003051196
9 septembre 1998
VILA AMIGÓ Mrs M. HION Mr R. NICOLINI Mrs M.F.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1028JUD000533907
28 octobre 2010
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 50.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325JUD000190205
25 mars 2014
On 12 July 2002 the Rzeszów Social Security Board asked the Main Social Security Board’s doctor (Główny Lekarz Orzecznik) to inform it whether the applicant’s son required the permanent care
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1025JUD001084284
25 octobre 1989
The applicant appealed to the Board claiming that the building prohibition was not valid. The Board rejected the appeal on 25 April 1980.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0913DEC002989996
13 septembre 2001
The Board estimated that the public care would need to be long-lasting.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1211DEC000262906
11 décembre 2007
On 3 February 2004 the tender was awarded by the Adjudication Board to Welcomeurope Consortium. 2.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-171801
8 février 2017
or in such other manner as the Board deems convenient. (2) If the Board so requests, such visits and inspections shall be attended by the Director and any other prison officer or officers designated by
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2020:CO10208
23 septembre 2020
Sur le rapport de Mme Graff-Daudret, conseiller, les observations écrites de la SCP Boré, Salve de Bruneton et Mégret, avocat de la société Bongard-Bazot et fils, de la SCP Célice, Texidor, Périer, avocat
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2022:SO10096
26 janvier 2022
la société Michel Bonnaud et fils et la condamne à payer à M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0120JUD002059408
20 janvier 2011
for the Board's decisions.