by the domestic courts to convict the applicants were relevant and sufficient and that the national instances did not overstep their margin of appreciation in the present case (see, mutatis mutandis, Kuliś

que H.B. était un personnage public dans le contexte du débat d’intérêt général décrit ci-dessus, les limites de la critique admissible étaient plus larges à son égard que pour un simple individu ( Kuliś

Hungary (no. 14962/03) Kuril v. Slovakia (no. 63959/00)     Thursday 5 October 2006   Müller v.

Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged infringement of one’s right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against the Slovak Republic (see, for example, Kuril

They have not been referred to the Court in compliance with Rule   47 of the Rules of Court and admissibility criteria and fall outside the scope of the case as it stands (see Kulák v.

Finlande (n o 47628/06) Arkadiusz Kubik c. Pologne (n o 45097/05) Górkiewicz c. Pologne (n o 41663/04) Kliber c. Pologne (n o 11522/03) Makuszewski c. Pologne (n o 35556/05) Pelizg c.

Kulick ,   conseillers   ; –     pour le gouvernement macédonien M.   K. Bogdanov ,   agent , M me   V. Stanojevska ,   conseiller .

The initial set of proceedings 1990 -1992   The applicant's father was subjected to repressions in 1929-1930 as a rich peasant (“ kulak ”).

They have not been referred to the Court in compliance with Rule   47 of the Rules of Court and admissibility criteria and therefore fall outside the scope of the case as it stands (see Kulák v.

Ukraine (no. 31175/14, §§ 56-61, 23 January 2025) and Kulák v. Slovakia (no. 57748/21, §§ 73-77, 3 April 2025). 15.

    La Cour est consciente que les sorties sous escorte causent des problèmes de nature financière et logistique ( Płoski , précité, § 37, et Kubiak c.

  10493/12, §   45, 27   November   2014; Kulik v.   Ukraine , no.   10397/10, §   59, 19   March   2015; and Yaroshovets and Others v. Ukraine , nos.

decisions extending detention precludes any substantive examination of the justification for continuing detention and is per se sufficient for finding a violation of Article 5 § 3 (see, mutatis mutandis , Kubik

  Royaume Uni , n o   68416/01, § 94, CEDH 2005-II; Kuliś et Różycki c.   Pologne, n o   27209/03, § 35, 6 octobre 2009, et Kharlamov c.

contributions de la juridiction a renvoyé la procédure à l'ordre judiciaire selon procès-verbal daté du 26 mars 1998 après avoir constaté l'échec du règlement amiable; Attendu que dans ce procès-verbal, Maître KUBIAK

    First medical examinations conducted two days after applicant’s release; no conclusive evidence indicating that injuries were sustained under police control (for relevant examples, see Kulyk

  33091/24 21/07/2022 Sergiy Mykolayovych KULIK 1972   Apartment no. 42 at 3 Poltavska St, Mariupol, Donetsk region Allegedly destroyed by artillery shelling between 30/03/2022 and 05/04/2022

for toilet, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower, passive smoking   12,500   26603/18 29/10/2018 Yevgeniy Sergeyevich KULIK

  68416/01, § 94, ECHR 2005-II; Kuliś and Różycki v. Poland , no.   27209/03, § 35, ECHR 2009 ‑ ...).

photos of the damaged apartment (damaged windows and doors); damage assessment report dated 06/06/2022; police report dated 14/07/2022. damage       22189/24 15/07/2022 Maryna Mykolayivna KULYK