On 30 March 2022 the Constitutional Court rejected her constitutional complaint.

Before doing so, he called the witnesses, namely the two neighbours, who confirmed what they were looking at. They called my son Duško.

       The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

Jean-Marie, - La SOCIETE MANEGES X..., contre l'arrêt de la cour d'appel de POITIERS, chambre correctionnelle, en date du 12 février 2004, qui, pour infractions à la législation fiscale sur les maisons

  In the case of Avanesyan v.

    The investigators considered that the investigative activities carried out in one case were relevant as evidence in another case.

In the case of Bülent Bekdemir v.

It is apparent from the search record of 14 March 2003 that a search was carried out in [the applicant’s] flat from 9.30 p.m. to 11 p.m.

Some of the inmates carried him to the infirmary but it was closed. Subsequently, a prison warden arrived and called an ambulance. The applicant’s son died on the way to the hospital. 8.

l'arrêt suivant : Sur le premier moyen, pris en sa première branche : Vu l'article 455 du nouveau Code de procédure civile ; Attendu que Mme X..., engagée le 16 septembre 1975 en qualité de caisière

    On 16 March 1993 the investigating judge asked a Dr Lavault to produce an additional expert report to verify whether the burns found on the victim’s body had been caused before death.

    Did the applicant have effective remedies for his complaint about a potential risk to his life or health in case of removal, as required by Article 13 of the Convention?

    On 7 March 2001 the applicant again complained of the alleged nuisance caused by the company. A new inspection of the site was carried out on 14 March 2001.

The applicant requested that N. and K., who had carried out the expert assessment in the case in 2000, be examined by a trial court.

12 March and 4   April 2018).

2021 communicated on 31 March 2025   SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s allegations of ill-treatment during her arrest and police custody.

2025   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 54764/18 Vladimir OULIANOV against the Republic of Moldova lodged on 11 November 2018 communicated on 10 March 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application

On the same day the investigating judge requested that further investigations be carried out as regards the applicant's case.

On 7 April 2003, following legislative amendments concerning the status of police officers, the case was referred to the prosecution service at the Bucharest County Court, which discontinued it on 2 March