CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

927 résultats pour « Privitello »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:1216DEC000509571

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 1972

16 décembre 1972

76 of the Danish Constitution did, indeed, grant all parents the right to free public education for their children and also the right to opt out of the state system and have their children educated privately

Page 21 sur 47

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253cb65bd3db21cbdd8d5f4

Appel

30 novembre 2010

30 novembre 2010

La société AK BAT a été chargée du gros oeuvre, l'entreprise PRIVITELLI a réalisé les chapes sur les balcons et la SARL PMG DECO s'est vue confier la pose du carrelage.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-173021

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2017

23 mars 2017

basis for the acts and decisions of the relevant state authorities in the present cases, and did those authorities have competence under domestic law to take decisions resulting in the deprivation of privately-owned

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0411JUD005667212

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2017

11 avril 2017

The applicant claimed that he had submitted a privately commissioned expert report on 30 March 2006 and requested a decision, but that the Plenary still had not taken any procedural steps. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146624

Admin. suprême

1 septembre 2014

1 septembre 2014

The applicant privately arranged his preferred surgery at the Wloclawek Hospital. However, he was informed that any such treatment required prior agreement of the Director of the Remand Centre.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-182289

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2018

23 mars 2018

on the administrative decisions related to the operation of the car-wash; the reports of the environmental protection inspectorate; a report of the court-appointed expert in environment protection; privately-produced

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-178468

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2017

10 octobre 2017

Application no. 11161/08 MONT BLANC TRADING LTD AND ANTARES TITANIUM TRADING LTD and ANTARES TITANIUM TRADING LTD against Ukraine lodged on 15 February 2008 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant companies are privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0903JUD002451419

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2024

3 septembre 2024

    The applicant asserted that the monitoring of the documents exchanged between him and his lawyer during their meetings in prison was in breach of his right to communicate privately with his

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0321JUD006641814

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2023

21 mars 2023

C. had been the only direct witness of the offence and the person who privately recorded the phone call used as evidence against the applicant. 20.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020JUD004793911

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2015

20 octobre 2015

that the applications were incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention since the State could not be held directly responsible for the debts of the debtor company, which was privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0707DEC004002609

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2022

7 juillet 2022

    The courts dismissed the claim in respect of the additional 20% compensation, finding that the 2007 Presidential Decree applied only to cases of expropriation of privately owned property

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1699264-1781109

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2006

19 juin 2006

The house was taken under state management after the entering into force, on 13 February 1946, of a decree giving the Polish authorities power to assign flats in privately-owned buildings to particular

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1213DEC004234104

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2005

13 décembre 2005

letter dated 29 June 2004 that “[f] rom what you say it does seem that if you proceed you will have to do so without poor person status and, if you cannot afford to instruct solicitors and counsel privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1210DEC005885318

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2024

10 décembre 2024

concerns the applicant’s conviction for trespassing following his refusal to discontinue his participation in a disruptive group protest against the Bundeswehr (the German federal armed forces) at a privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146497

Admin. suprême

27 août 2014

27 août 2014

Dario DI MATTIA 28/05/1928 Ancona 38 Pierluigi FERRATI 21/06/1931 Firenze 39 Tito Italo GRECO 30/03/1941 Rende 40 Iolanda MODOLO 14/11/1925 Trieste 41 Giuseppe PANTANO 12/11/1921 Taranto 42 Giovanni PRIVITERA

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0516DEC002605607

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2019

16 mai 2019

19/05/1930   Maria PETRACCONE 27/08/1941   Mario PIAZZOLLA 18/01/1938   Marianna PODDA 21/07/1942   Iole Maria POL 13/10/1926     Atos PORCU 11/03/1937   Giovanni PRIVITERA

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-156172

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2015

18 juin 2015

Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention, that in order to ensure that the defence was able to question effectively an expert during the hearing, he or she could make use of the professional support of a privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-156168

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2015

18 juin 2015

Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention, that in order to ensure that the defence was able to question effectively an expert during the hearing, he or she could make use of the professional support of a privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-156173

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2015

18 juin 2015

Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention, that in order to ensure that the defence was able to question effectively an expert during the hearing, he or she could make use of the professional support of a privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0605DEC006467201

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2007

5 juin 2007

The applicant, on his part, made no mention of this flat in his submissions leaving it unclear whether it was state-provided or privately rented.

Source officielle