On the same day, the Federal Constitutional Court also declared, for the same reasons, the provisions of the Federal Child Benefits Act ( Bundeskindergeldgesetz ) to be unconstitutional (case nos. 1 BvL

The applicant complains that the proceedings on his request for payment of additional contributions to the social pension scheme accepted lasted unreasonably long.

  The applicant’s detention pending trial had lasted two years, three months and 13 days.

The court made the order on the same day.

The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the criminal proceedings against him had lasted an unreasonably long time. 2.

Therefore, the proceedings at issue lasted twelve years and eleven months.

Until the same date the action may be extended to further defendants.

The arrest lasted 29 days during which time he was denied sleep and got only a minimum amount of food. The above mentioned torture was repeated. The applicant’s brother was arrested at the same time.

They thus lasted over fourteen years for two levels of jurisdiction.

Each visit lasted four hours. 62.     On 3 October 2012 the US applicants formally agreed to adopt V.T. 63.

of PLZ 32,382,832 and based on the same grounds, i.e. the allegedly incorrect evaluation of the price for the same apartment.

  Repetitive cases   In the following cases the Court has reached the same findings as in similar cases raising the same issues under the Convention:            

    Repetitive case   In the following case the Court has reached the same finding as in similar cases raising the same issues under the Convention:     Violation of Article 6

  Repetitive cases   In the following cases the Court has reached the same findings as in similar cases raising the same issues under the Convention:     Violation of Article 6 § 1

  Repetitive cases   In the following cases the Court has reached the same findings as in similar cases raising the same issues under the Convention:     Violation of Article 1 of Protocol

    At the same time the Court observes that Oleksandr Lanetskyy was injured in April 1997 and died in May 1997, whereas the last decision concerning A. Y.'

It thus lasted fourteen years and five months. During the period under consideration the case was pending at one level of jurisdiction. 35.

    Meanwhile, on 7 June 2006 the applicant instituted new enforcement proceedings before the same court seeking execution of the same judgment.

On the same day he went through a medical examination at the Haseki Research Hospital.

  Subsequently, the applicant repeatedly complained to the president of the District Court that the proceedings lasted unreasonably long.