CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1206DEC003062313
6 décembre 2016
    On 24 February 2010 the applicants verbally requested that the Marriage Registrar publish the marriage banns and to this end they produced the second applicant’s birth certificate, a certificate
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0421JUD004740507
21 avril 2016
They added that the judgment of 2 October 1998 was replacing the mayor’s administrative decision on the applicants’ request for restitution, and was thus open to indirect judicial review.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119JUD002665408
19 janvier 2010
It must thus be determined whether this application concerned the same subject-matter as the previous one or whether it was a new application introducing a different subject-matter.
cr
61372637cd58014677423db9
9 novembre 2004
cannabis et la marijuana ; qu'il n'est pas contesté que des tee- shirts, des autocollants, des cartes postales et des affiches portant les inscriptions suivantes : "fumeurs, cultivez plus, risquez moins", "THC
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0602DEC003814712
2 juin 2015
The Appeal Court judgment of 28 May 2009 was thus no longer binding in any respect. The Supreme Court reached this conclusion by 3 votes to 2. The decision contains two dissenting opinions. B.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10930
15 octobre 2015
The Court acknowledged this diversity.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3089796-3420169
6 avril 2010
  About ten days later they were informed that their placement was the result of an order issued by the deputy director general of the prison administration, but they were not shown the order.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD005821612
17 janvier 2017
They explained that they had been the victims of human trafficking.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1107DEC005834100
7 novembre 2002
Thus, the court found that the dismissal was disproportional to the offence committed.
ECLI:CEDH:002-11188
15 septembre 2016
The Gurkhas were originally based abroad, but since 1 July 1997 they have been based in the United Kingdom.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0927JUD000630105
27 septembre 2007
Thus, the taxpayer's estate, and the National Tax Board ( Riksskatteverket ), appealed to the Supreme Administrative Court and requested that the tax surcharges be repealed as they could not be imposed
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1115DEC000862805
15 novembre 2005
Thus, they could not be granted asylum. Moreover, the applicants had presented no grounds on which they could be granted residence permits on humanitarian grounds.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0922DEC004223519
22 septembre 2020
This list included the death of the applicants’ father. 14.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1964:1001DEC000160262
1 octobre 1964
Ada Tammy, the Applicant's counsel, was dismissed by the Regional Court of Vienna on thy January 1962. The Court of Appeal of Vienna upheld this decision on 14th March 1962.   6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0919DEC003939498
19 septembre 2000
He pointed out that some Austrian right wing terrorists or extremists had emerged from this party, which they had left in the early 1980s when the party supported more moderate positions.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-157306
25 août 2015
Moreover, the unlawful search of the applicant’s own mobile telephone provided the police with the crucial information on who had communicated with X on the day of the murder and thus with the basis for
ECLI:CEDH:002-4310
22 juin 2004
They did not wish to leave in order to join the applicants, whom they knew only vaguely, and preferred to remain in the centre, where they seemed to have established social and emotional ties with the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0318JUD002149793
18 mars 1997
without informing Decazeville Town Council of this beforehand and thus deprived it of the right to make submissions during the preparation of the expert report.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD005012407
12 décembre 2017
In this connection, they considered that the applicants had abused the right of petition because they had failed to mention the latter fact in their application forms. 35.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0721JUD005050609
21 juillet 2016
    The applicants pointed out that they had brought a rei vindicatio action for the protection of their property rights, this being the only procedure “whereby they could raise the substance
Page 21 sur 4857