CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

97 129 résultats pour « Thys »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1206DEC003062313

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2016

6 décembre 2016

    On 24 February 2010 the applicants verbally requested that the Marriage Registrar publish the marriage banns and to this end they produced the second applicant’s birth certificate, a certificate

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0421JUD004740507

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2016

21 avril 2016

They added that the judgment of 2 October 1998 was replacing the mayor’s administrative decision on the applicants’ request for restitution, and was thus open to indirect judicial review.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119JUD002665408

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2010

19 janvier 2010

It must thus be determined whether this application concerned the same subject-matter as the previous one or whether it was a new application introducing a different subject-matter.

Source officielle
CC

cr

61372637cd58014677423db9

Cassation

9 novembre 2004

9 novembre 2004

cannabis et la marijuana ; qu'il n'est pas contesté que des tee- shirts, des autocollants, des cartes postales et des affiches portant les inscriptions suivantes : "fumeurs, cultivez plus, risquez moins", "THC

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0602DEC003814712

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2015

2 juin 2015

The Appeal Court judgment of 28 May 2009 was thus no longer binding in any respect. The Supreme Court reached this conclusion by 3 votes to 2. The decision contains two dissenting opinions. B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10930

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2015

15 octobre 2015

The Court acknowledged this diversity.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3089796-3420169

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2010

6 avril 2010

  About ten days later they were informed that their placement was the result of an order issued by the deputy director general of the prison administration, but they were not shown the order.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD005821612

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2017

17 janvier 2017

They explained that they had been the victims of human trafficking.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1107DEC005834100

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2002

7 novembre 2002

Thus, the court found that the dismissal was disproportional to the offence committed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11188

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2016

15 septembre 2016

The Gurkhas were originally based abroad, but since 1 July 1997 they have been based in the United Kingdom.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0927JUD000630105

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2007

27 septembre 2007

Thus, the taxpayer's estate, and the National Tax Board ( Riksskatteverket ), appealed to the Supreme Administrative Court and requested that the tax surcharges be repealed as they could not be imposed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1115DEC000862805

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2005

15 novembre 2005

Thus, they could not be granted asylum. Moreover, the applicants had presented no grounds on which they could be granted residence permits on humanitarian grounds.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0922DEC004223519

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2020

22 septembre 2020

This list included the death of the applicants’ father. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1964:1001DEC000160262

Admin. suprême

1 octobre 1964

1 octobre 1964

Ada Tammy, the Applicant's counsel, was dismissed by the Regional Court of Vienna on thy January 1962. The Court of Appeal of Vienna upheld this decision on 14th March 1962.   6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0919DEC003939498

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2000

19 septembre 2000

He pointed out that some Austrian right wing terrorists or extremists had emerged from this party, which they had left in the early 1980s when the party supported more moderate positions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-157306

Admin. suprême

25 août 2015

25 août 2015

Moreover, the unlawful search of the applicant’s own mobile telephone provided the police with the crucial information on who had communicated with X on the day of the murder and thus with the basis for

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4310

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2004

22 juin 2004

They did not wish to leave in order to join the applicants, whom they knew only vaguely, and preferred to remain in the centre, where they seemed to have established social and emotional ties with the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0318JUD002149793

Admin. suprême

18 mars 1997

18 mars 1997

without informing Decazeville Town Council of this beforehand and thus deprived it of the right to make submissions during the preparation of the expert report.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD005012407

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2017

12 décembre 2017

In this connection, they considered that the applicants had abused the right of petition because they had failed to mention the latter fact in their application forms. 35.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0721JUD005050609

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2016

21 juillet 2016

    The applicants pointed out that they had brought a rei vindicatio action for the protection of their property rights, this being the only procedure “whereby they could raise the substance

Source officielle

Page 21 sur 4857

← PrécédentSuivant →