AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;STATEMENTOFFACTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2809984-3075486
23 novembre 2009
23 novembre 2009
If not, in what way are asylum seekers meant to obtain such essentials? 3.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1849493-1956218
30 novembre 2006
30 novembre 2006
I have no idea, and what does he presume to be? That man likens himself to God. There is no medical practitioner, surely, who could say that?”
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0824DEC004218698
24 août 1999
24 août 1999
The law is sensible enough to say, we have twelve ordinary, decent, sensible people to decide what is indecent or not and it is you, ladies and gentlemen, you will decide what is indecent”.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1014DEC002506894
14 octobre 1996
14 octobre 1996
If so, what form should it take?
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602JUD007113013
2 juin 2020
2 juin 2020
(b) What was the volume of the minerals extracted by the applicant company outside the allocated area?
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0402DEC001957992
2 avril 1993
2 avril 1993
It may well be that what was going on with the first three children [the W. children] was a form of therapy.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-183703
14 mai 2018
14 mai 2018
Was the length of the civil proceedings in the present case in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, especially with what was at stake
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216007
3 février 2022
3 février 2022
In particular, what was the legal basis for the applicant’s involuntary hospitalisation?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-211004
8 juin 2021
8 juin 2021
In particular, what was the legal basis for the applicant’s involuntary hospitalisation?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212606
18 février 2019
18 février 2019
What, if any, indications exist in the materials submitted to the Court in support of the Government’s argument ‑ put forward in their observations (§§ 139-140) but not raised in the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-145336
12 juin 2014
12 juin 2014
The applicant enclosed copies of statements of appeal but did not inform the Court whether or not they were examined and, if so, on which dates and what the outcome was.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-210457
17 mai 2021
17 mai 2021
(b) On what date, and by which State authority, were the decisions for the applicants’ administrative detention taken?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-210688
28 mai 2021
28 mai 2021
To what extent did the search and seizure in question affect an attorney ‑ client relationship, notably the attorney-client relationship between the law firm and the Volkswagen stock corporation
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0630DEC002654520
30 juin 2022
30 juin 2022
that the use of videoconferencing equipment is compatible with the notion of a fair and public hearing, provided that the detainee is able to follow the proceedings, to see the persons present and hear what
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3749
15 juillet 2005
15 juillet 2005
witness statement; neither the deceased’s family nor their representative had been kept informed of progress in the investigation; the public prosecutor’s office itself had had difficulties in verifying what
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1796
2 décembre 2008
2 décembre 2008
The seriousness of child abuse as a social problem required that persons acting in good faith in what they believed were the best interests of the child should not be influenced by fear of being prosecuted
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-213131
15 octobre 2021
15 octobre 2021
In particular, what measures were taken and which additional counterbalancing measures could have been taken by the domestic prosecution authorities and by the domestic courts to safeguard the applicant
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209271
15 mars 2021
15 mars 2021
What was the statutory or decisional law basis of such presumption? What were the procedural safeguards provided to the applicant to reverse that presumption of fact? 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-141578
6 février 2014
6 février 2014
It is unclear whether the expert prepared the opinion and what its conclusion was.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3759
5 juillet 2005
5 juillet 2005
Even though the material submitted was of a general nature, it was difficult to see what additional evidence the applicant could reasonably have been expected to produce in support of his version of events
Source officiellePage 21 sur 1002