The applicant alleged that he had not been presented before an investigating judge within forty-eight hours of his arrest, in breach of domestic law.

His nephew, Burhan Acar, was at the applicant's house, together with a guest.

These factors had forced many people to abandon their houses and workplaces and had caused a significant drop in the property values in the area.

Appeal to the House of Lords There is a right of appeal to the House of Lords against a decision of the Divisional Court in its capacity as an appellate court.

that he had been deprived of his liberty at 8.15   p.m. on 6 July and as he had been brought before the investigating judge at 5 p.m. on 9 July, less than seventy-two hours had elapsed.

    Mr P.P., born in 1961, lived with his mother in a flat on the ground floor of a three-storey house in Lyaskovets. 6.

  Yakymenko dated 28/07/10; timesheets (107.5   hours at EUR   110 per hour, including advance at EUR   10 per hour and remaining amounts outstanding) Government: Claims exorbitant

  On 12 March 1990, he stated to the House of Commons, in reply to a question (Hansard, House of Commons, 12 March 1990, column 14):         "Whereas it was open to the

    The armed men ordered the second applicant to raise his hands and entered the house. There they forced him to his knees and searched the house without producing any warrant.

    After the residents came out, one serviceman threw a hand-grenade into the basement of the third applicant’s house. The explosion damaged the house. 16.

He had asked them how they could live in a house with Chetniks ( četnici ) who had killed his 6-year-old child. The other man had taken N.K. from upstairs and out of the house.

detention from 8.30 p.m. on   14/07/2019 to 2.40 a.m. on 15/07/2019, from noon on   21/08/2019 to 22/08/2019:     Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three ‑ hour

The first three applicants were arrested but were refused legal assistance for periods of between four and eight hours to enable the police to conduct “safety interviews”.

hours (of outdoor exercise/recreation and/or sport).

By an order of 6 July 2000 the Plovdiv Court of Appeal decided to place him under house arrest.

It also proclaims the election results, allocates the seats obtained and informs the relevant house of parliament.

Both the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords decision on the applicant’s appeal followed the decision of the House of Lords in Runa   Begum v. London Borough of Tower Hamlets [2003] UKHL 5.

This decision was quashed in judicial review proceedings by the House of Lords on 12 June 1997. Since that date, no new tariff has yet been set.

On the morning of 23 April 2003 a British Army unit came to the house hoping to arrest the applicant.