sitting on 2   December 2014 as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Linos-Alexandre

Moldova (no. 22970/02)         Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Alexandru Ţîmbal, a Moldovan national who was born in 1944 and lives in Chişinău (Moldova), complained about

.s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Applications nos. 13272/07 and 13278/07 by Alexandru

remedy ineffective, the Court considers that it may be appropriate for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 to take as the start of the six-month period the date when the applicant first became or ought to have

, when a judgment was delivered, was unknown to the Court and could not reasonably have been known to that party, request the Court ... to revise that judgment. ...” 6.

Firstly, because there was no certainty that the property would have been leased throughout the entire period of time.

They submitted that the applicant should have appealed against the Supreme Court’s decision to a three-member panel of the same court. 31.

    The relevant Convention principles have been summarised in the Court’s judgment in the case of Dimitrov and Hamanov (see Dimitrov and   Hamanov v.

Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 10 June 2014 as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

    The applications have been communicated to the Government . THE LAW A.     Joinder of the applications 5.

; September 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

been considered as construction land and the compensation should have corresponded to its market value. 10.

    In all cases, did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaints under Articles 3, 5 § 1, 10 and 11 of the Convention and Article 2 of Protocol No

    Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, as required by Article   13 of the Convention, considering

    However, as indicated above, there is no obligation to have recourse to remedies which are inadequate or ineffective.

    The mother also requested that the principal of the said school, call an employee called "Massimo" to have some explanations, but the principal refused.

By this date, they have thus lasted more than thirteen years. 17.

Christos KARAGIANNIS against Greece The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 6   December 2011 as a Committee composed of:   Anatoly Kovler, President,   Linos-Alexandre

M.A. contre la Grèce La Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (première section), siégeant le 29 septembre 2020 en un comité composé de   :   Krzysztof Wojtyczek, président,   Linos-Alexandre