Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
civ3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2011:C301424
30 novembre 2011
30 novembre 2011
réseau de circulation de produits dans des laboratoires pharmaceutiques, a sous-traité une partie des travaux à la société Audincourt Rhône Alpes (société ARA), aux droits de laquelle vient la société Boccard
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1107DEC000470105
7 novembre 2006
7 novembre 2006
On 29 September 2004 the Aliens Appeals Board rejected the appeal, sharing the Migration Board’s reasoning and conclusion.
Source officielleCHAMBRE SOCIALE A
6431063728558704f52e691d
5 avril 2023
5 avril 2023
à la société Boccard de réintégrer M.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1016DEC002782395
16 octobre 1996
16 octobre 1996
appeal without having held an oral hearing and without having obtained further observations from the Board and so based its decision on the Board's unconfirmed and incorrect submissions.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020JUD000085808
20 octobre 2009
20 octobre 2009
On 1 June 2000 the Warsaw Local Government Board of Appeal upheld the Board's decision of 1 June 1999.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1207DEC001557689
7 décembre 1989
7 décembre 1989
The applicants also allege a violation of Article 13 (Art. 13) of the Convention on the ground that the procedure before the National Immigration Board and the Government
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-151142
12 janvier 2015
12 janvier 2015
On 29 March 2004 its Governing Board (hereinafter “the Board”) approved the applicant’s acquisition.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-118154
6 mars 2013
6 mars 2013
Region (“the Qualifications Board”) to dismiss the applicant from her post.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1208DEC000752815
8 décembre 2015
8 décembre 2015
On 21 May 2014 the Board rejected the request, reiterating the reasoning of the Prison.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-890
13 juillet 2010
13 juillet 2010
In March 2002 he became eligible for release on parole and the Parole Board recommended his release.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0421DEC005145411
21 avril 2015
21 avril 2015
The Bellevue area is considered to be cultural heritage of national interest and has been recognised as such by the National Heritage Board ( Riksantikvarieämbetet ). 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0112DEC005912208
12 janvier 2010
12 janvier 2010
The Board imposed extensive restrictions on the use of the property, including building and logging bans. The Board did not hold an oral hearing.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1130DEC000119004
30 novembre 2004
30 novembre 2004
On 12 October 2001, the Parole Board considered his case again.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1028JUD001894991
28 octobre 1994
28 octobre 1994
On 17 December 1990 they lodged an application for legal aid to pay for representation at the hearing of the appeal with the Scottish Legal Aid Board ("the Board").
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1021DEC002237793
21 octobre 1996
21 octobre 1996
Allegedly, he was also unable to comment on the Unemployment Fund's opinion which was obtained by the Board for Unemployment Benefits and taken into account both by that Board and by the Insurance Court
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0228JUD004747399
28 février 2006
28 février 2006
The Board visited the area before deciding on 24 September 1993 to reject the appeal. 17. The neighbours appealed to the Government, invoking the same grounds as before the Board.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0628DEC001563616
28 juin 2016
28 juin 2016
included in the basis of the decision of the Refugee Appeals Board.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0201JUD005183799
1 février 2005
1 février 2005
There has therefore been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 72.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0316DEC001579589
16 mars 1990
16 mars 1990
Board of 2 November 1989.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0221DEC003502197
21 février 2002
21 février 2002
In May, June and October 1989, the Provincial Land Reform Board ( Landesagrarsenat - “the Provincial Board”), sitting in camera, held hearings on these appeals.
Source officiellePage 22 sur 368