seized of the case under Article 5, paragraph 2, of Protocol No. 11, declared admissible the complaint that as an adulterine child, his inheritance rights over his mother's estate had been limited as compared

Consequently, for numerous claims the statutory time-limit was on 31   December 2004.

» ou 'Comparez les avocats' ou toute formulation équivalente constitue une pratique commerciale trompeuse au sens de l'article L 121-1 et une violation des dispositions des articles L111-5, L111-5-1 du

It rejected the applicant's claim for reimbursement and for the higher grading of his compensation.

During the proceedings, the applicant specified her claim on three occasions.

fee not dependent on the value of the claim (see paragraph 16 above). 27.

Z..., l'enquête permet d'affirmer qu'elle mentionne des faits inexacts dans la mesure où il est clairement établi que Salouha X...

The applicant argued that he could still claim to be a victim of the alleged violation.

The article stated that the Moscow mayor would bring several defamation claims against Mr Nemtsov.

In this respect the claim for damages did not amount to a new “criminal charge” against the applicant’s father.

The applicants appealed to the County Administrative Court ( länsrätten ) in Stockholm, maintaining their claim and adding that the reasoning of the Board had been erroneous and contradictory since the

On 2 February 2022 the Vilnius Regional Court allowed the prosecutor’s claim in part.

compared to (ordinary) bankruptcy proceedings. 4.

    The proceedings started on 11   July 2014 when the claim was lodged. On 11 September 2018 the first-instance court rejected the claim on account of procedural deficiencies.

l'arrêt suivant : Sur le rapport de M. le conseiller CHALLE, les observations de la société civile professionnelle BOUZIDI et BOUHANNA, avocat en la Cour, et les conclusions de Mme l'avocat général COMMARET

de Mme le conseiller référendaire BEAUDONNET, les observations de Me COSSA, de la société civile professionnelle PEIGNOT et GARREAU, avocats en la Cour, et les conclusions de Mme l'avocat général COMMARET

septembre deux mille six, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le rapport de M. le conseiller référendaire DELBANO, les observations de Me BALAT, avocat en la Cour, et les conclusions de Mme l'avocat général COMMARET

As regards the following year (1997), the applicant's claims are identical to those of the preceding years. However, these proceedings are still pending before the Court of Appeal.

However, having regard to the reasonable time requirement, consistent judicial practice and expeditious processes had been required to deal with almost 7,000 pending property claims.