The judgment in the applicant’s favour became final and the State Bailiffs’ Service instituted proceedings to enforce it.

In 2002, following changes in legislation, the court decision in the applicant's favour was reinstated by the Supreme Court of Ukraine.

They acknowledged the excessive length of the enforcement of the final and enforceable judgments in the applicants' favour.

account the Government’s argument that, in the circumstances of the case, the most appropriate form of redress would be the enforcement of the judgment of 22   January 2014 in the applicant’s favour

COMPLAINTS The applicants complain about the non-enforcement of the judgments in their favour.

applicant also complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that the Ministry of Interior did not pay to him the sum awarded in the final court decision of 12 December 2005 in his favour

    By two separate judgments of 4 June 2007, one in favour of Mr   Pavlenko and another in favour of the remaining applicants, the Mineralniye Vody Town Court of the Stavropol Region upheld

    Judgment of 10 June 2002 in the applicant’s favour 6.

    Partial privatisation in favour of the applicant 12.

#Impugnazione – Aiuti di Stato – Aiuti messi in atto dalla Repubblica francese a favore della Sernam – Aiuto alla ristrutturazione e ricapitalizzazione, garanzie e rinuncia a crediti da parte della SNCF

#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Aiuti di Stato – Nozione – Naufragio della petroliera Erika – Regime di aiuti a favore di imprese di acquacoltura e di pesca – Decisione che dichiara il regime di aiuti parzialmente

Article 6 § 1 (fair hearing) – The fair trial rules should have been interpreted in a way that guaranteed the applicant an effective remedy to have the judgment in his favour enforced.

font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   034 15.01.2010         Press release issued by the Registrar   RUSSIA VOTES IN FAVOUR

  Article 11 Article 11-1 Freedom of association Disciplinary sanctions on teachers for having breached constitutional ban on civil servants striking: relinquishment in favour of the Grand Chamber

On 12   June 2015 the Zagreb Municipal Civil Court (successor of the Zagreb Municipal Court) ruled in favour of the insurance company and discontinued the applicant’s right to future instalments.

The Court communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) the issue concerning the delayed enforcement of the final judgment in the applicant’s favour and declared the remainder of the application

Under Article 6 of the Convention he also complained as regards the non-enforcement of the domestic court’s judgment adopted in his favour. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

The application concerns the conviction of the applicant for membership of the PKK, an illegal armed organisation under Articles 220 § 6 and 314 of the Criminal Code, for disseminating propaganda in favour

A total of 140 MPs were present, 139 MPs cast their votes and 70 MPs voted in favour of the referral request.