Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2022613-2135734
31 mai 2007
31 mai 2007
The Court held by six votes to one that there had been a violation of Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) of the European Convention on Human Rights taken in conjunction with Article 11 (
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0325JUD007759701
25 mars 2003
25 mars 2003
At the hearing held on 8 March 1994 the court allowed the applications to hear witnesses with the help of the Polish Consulate in New York.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1206DEC000811515
6 décembre 2022
6 décembre 2022
She was accused of having – on five occasions – claimed and accepted money and goods, including a car, from C.E.S. and C.O. in order to help their company to succeed in a public call for tenders for the
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1010894-1044779
25 mai 2004
25 mai 2004
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and that it was not necessary to rule on the complaint under Article 13.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2212826-2368641
18 décembre 2007
18 décembre 2007
The Court held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security) or of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2187678-2338277
27 novembre 2007
27 novembre 2007
The Court held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security).
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1305419-1361587
5 avril 2005
5 avril 2005
The Court therefore held, unanimously, that there had been a breach of Article 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1970:0714DEC000406569
14 juillet 1970
14 juillet 1970
S. attacked him, pushed him brutally against the protective railing of the cell and started to beat him with his fists, in one of which he held a heavy key.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1057499-1098779
27 juillet 2004
27 juillet 2004
It accordingly held that there was no need to examine that complaint.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2384063-2558862
29 mai 2008
29 mai 2008
It further held that it was not necessary to examine the applicant’s complaint under Article 5 § 4.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68294-68762
30 novembre 2000
30 novembre 2000
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 4 (right to liberty and security) and awarded her 4,000 Swiss francs (CHF) for costs and expenses and dismissed the remainder of
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68204-68672
11 avril 2000
11 avril 2000
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 3, given the authorities’ failure to investigate Ms Veznedaroğlu’s torture allegations, and awarded her 2,000 US Dollars for
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55834
14 février 2000
14 février 2000
, by sixteen votes to four, that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention; - held, unanimously, that the finding of a violation constituted sufficient just satisfaction in
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1654837-1733985
26 avril 2006
26 avril 2006
It also held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in all the cases.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10502
19 février 2015
19 février 2015
That assistance was not provided in addition to any care dispensed by health care professionals, and the prisoner assigned to help the applicant had not received the training required to assist a person
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1310081-1375170
14 avril 2005
14 avril 2005
The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1319124-1376257
27 avril 2005
27 avril 2005
A public chamber hearing was held at the Human Rights Building in Strasbourg on 16 December 2003.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1887236-1982054
9 janvier 2007
9 janvier 2007
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1900054-1995518
23 janvier 2007
23 janvier 2007
The Court held that there had been violations of Articles 6 § 1 and 10.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1036210-1072091
29 juin 2004
29 juin 2004
The Court further held, unanimously, that the question of the application of Article 41 (just satisfaction) was not ready for decision. (The judgment is available only in English.) 1.
Source officiellePage 22 sur 2571