The applicant conducted his case in person.   His wife was represented by solicitor and counsel.

Date de l'acte de saisine : 06 Mars 2025 Date de saisine : 21 Mars 2025 Nature de l'affaire : Appel sur une décision relative à l'admission du plan de redressement Décision attaquée : n° 2024P02643 rendue

In the same year his mother left the applicant and his two brothers in the care of his paternal grandparents in India.

They put a shirt on his head and then placed his head between his legs, so he could not see where he was taken to.

His father and his brother, who had not been members of the USC, but had supported his uncle's activities, had been executed in May 1990.

    In his application, the applicant has not indicated the location of the site or sites at which he was held after his transfer from Guantánamo Bay until his rendition to Lithuania.

The fact remains that, as a result of that decision, the applicant’s share in his only real estate, which was also his home, worth HRK   131,200 [3] , was sold to his creditor for one-third of the

being kidnapped from his workplace in order to keep secret the real reason for his absence.

The responsibility was his and the rationality of his judgment is not challenged.

As a result the court reduced his sentence by one year. 7.

did not detect any changes in his lungs.

The judge, of his own motion, or on a reasoned request of the prosecutor, the arrested person or his counsel, is entitled to hear the prosecutor in the absence of the arrested person and his counsel, or

  However, the Commission is of the opinion that in the present case there are no indications that the applicant's treatment in Morocco would render his expulsion contrary to Article 3 (art. 3) of

He locked himself up in the bathroom and slashed the veins on his legs, his right arm and his neck. He lost consciousness and subsequently regained it in the medical ward.

charges against him re-examined in his presence.

to fear for his own arrest and consequently, in view of his resistance activities in the past, for his safety.

When his friend was out of the car, the applicant shifted his car into gear. The car started moving, bumping into his friend and injuring him slightly.

  The applicant complains that his detention following his arrest on 22 November 1996 has been unlawful.

The applicant, who mistakenly understood that L. had been invited by his parents, consented to engage him and repeated his previous testimony in his presence.