AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1012DEC002792521
12 octobre 2023
12 octobre 2023
On 04.04.14: “You kill a policeman? They will look for you even under the stones. Police kill? Not even properly investigated.”
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0702JUD001721507
2 juillet 2013
2 juillet 2013
11819004606 with respect to the alleged ill-treatment of the applicant in the short-term detention unit of the Rīga Main police station ( Rīgas Galvenās Policijas Pārvaldes Īslaicīgās aizturēšanas
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0906DEC006697601
6 septembre 2005
6 septembre 2005
However, no part of the appellate court’s reasoning was based on the evidence given by the policeman whose testimony had been allowed by the decision of 16 June 2000.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1867903-1961399
5 décembre 2006
5 décembre 2006
In those circumstances, the Court considered that the police’s forceful intervention had been disproportionate and had not been necessary for the prevention of disorder within the meaning of the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-141722
14 février 2014
14 février 2014
He argued that the diagnosis had merely reflected the police's instructions and failed to take into account the fact that he had not had any mental issues in the past.
Source officielleRETENTIONS
634e41d3dfc182adff7ad574
16 octobre 2022
16 octobre 2022
Ainsi, en l'espèce, l'arrêté du préfet du Rhône est motivé, notamment, par les éléments suivants : - [V] [Y] a bénéficié d'une autorisation provisoire de séjour par la préfecture de policede Paris expirée
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1118DEC000495220
18 novembre 2025
18 novembre 2025
Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to it, the applicants complain that the respondent State failed to assist them in obtaining enforcement of the final judgments in their favour, and in particular about the police’s
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0615DEC004889599
15 juin 2000
15 juin 2000
On 31 July 1996 the applicant challenged the refusal of the bishop to give him permission to transfer to Piraeus before the multi-member first instance civil court ( polimeles protodikio
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-162815
12 avril 2016
12 avril 2016
In particular, he claims that: the heroin was planted on him by the police during his personal search; the police’s refusal to allow independent witnesses to attend his personal search was unlawful; the
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2701680-2950264
9 avril 2009
9 avril 2009
The police’s interest in A attracted considerable media attention. Several national newspapers reported on his interrogation and criminal past, but did not disclose his identity.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3088799-3421216
6 avril 2010
6 avril 2010
The court found in particular that the statement made by the rape victim had not been reliable as she had not brought the issue to the police’s attention and concluded that the accusations in the article
Source officielle2ème chambre - formation à 3
DCA_21LY02886_20230622
22 juin 2023
22 juin 2023
En 2005, M. et Mme B sont devenus propriétaires à Poliénas (Isère) d'un corps de ferme comprenant une ancienne grange dont ils ont fait leur maison d'habitation principale après l'avoir aménagée, une partie
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1728186-1812042
13 juillet 2006
13 juillet 2006
Policed forced entry and searched the applicants' home under the mistaken belief that a robber lived there.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002DEC002982804
2 octobre 2007
2 octobre 2007
Criminal proceedings against the applicant On 25 June 2001 the applicant, a policeman, was detained on remand.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0410DEC000699302
10 avril 2007
10 avril 2007
The applicant complained to the Riga City Central Police Department ( Rīgas Pilsētas Galvenā Policijas Pārvalde ) about this fact.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1265353-1318521
23 février 2005
23 février 2005
The case concerns the killing on 19 July 1996 of the applicants’ relatives, Kuncho Angelov (father of Ms Nachova) and Kiril Petkov (son of Ms Rangelova and Mr Rangelov), both aged 21, by a military policeman
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1114DEC005029510
14 novembre 2019
14 novembre 2019
1940 142 288 9 000 100 50352/10 27/08/2010 Luigi Cimetti 29/11/1940 132 575 9 000 100 50353/10 27/08/2010 Lino Fibioli 05/03/1944 129 863 9 000 100 50360/10 27/08/2010 Giorgio Polinelli
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-208723
15 février 2021
15 février 2021
On the basis of information obtained from the Latvian intelligence services – the Constitution Protection Bureau ( Satversmes aizsardzības birojs ) and the Security Police ( Drošības policija ) – the Central
Source officiellePRESS;GCREFERRALS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1656620-1735874
25 avril 2006
25 avril 2006
Netherlands nationals, are: Renee Ramsahai, Mildred Ramsahai and Ricky Ramsahai, the grandfather, grandmother and father, respectively, of Moravia Ramsahai, born on 6 December 1979, who was shot dead by a policeman
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-150746
18 décembre 2014
18 décembre 2014
the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows: On 26 December 1993 the applicant was detained on remand by the “Police of Republic of Serbian Krajina” (Policija
Source officiellePage 22 sur 79