JM was convicted by the same judgment.

    Repetitive cases   In the following cases the Court has reached the same findings as in similar cases raising the same issues under the Convention.

In reply, it was submitted that the decision of 13 September 2011 was pronounced on the same date at 5.50 p.m.

After his statement was taken by the police, he was released on the same day.

On the same day the applicant was placed in detention on remand.

He further complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the criminal proceedings against him lasted for nine years which violated the reasonable time requirement set out by the Convention.

On the same day, he was detained on remand.

    He further complained under the same Article that the Insurance Court’s decision had not been sufficiently reasoned. 3.

    The applicant was represented by the same lawyer until the appeal proceedings in the Novi Sad Court of Appeal. 10.

The proceedings therefore lasted about three years and one month. 18.

It thus lasted 6 years and almost 6 months for two levels of jurisdiction.

At the same time, he repaid the loan together with interest to Fintling . As the capital gain corresponded to the interest, they were set off against each other.

On the same day, the applicants applied to register the association with the Ministry of Justice.

       The proceedings, therefore, lasted from 13 May 1988 until 11 November 1994, i.e. altogether six and a half years.

It thus lasted five years and seven months at one level of jurisdiction. A.     Admissibility 18.

As recommended in the same leaflet, they wore no distinctive clothing or signs that would identify them as participants in the march.

Using the same method of valuation, the second committee opined that the applicants’ land was worth TRL   110,403,000,000.

It was to be communicated where necessary to the parties and to the advocate-general, under the same conditions.

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article   6   §   1, the proceedings having lasted for some 14 years and five months for two levels of jurisdiction.

Six other persons intervened in the case, laying claim to the same plots. 6.