Vu l'article 17 de la Convention pour l'unification de certaines règles relatives au transporteur aérien international, signée à Varsovie, le 12 octobre 1929 ; Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué, que

    The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.

  17599/05) delivered on 22 October 2009, in particular to the finding under Article 46 of the Convention that overcrowding in Polish prisons and remand centres revealed a structural problem, Having

; 1 of the Convention.

The applicant argued, inter alia , that the lack of publicity of the trial proceedings breached his rights under Article 6 of the Convention.

34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS

down in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see, for instance, Manukyan v.

3 of the Convention. 4.

The articles discussed various alleged improper business practices by K.M. in relation to shop operators who leased business premises at the shopping centre.

Lastly, they complain under Article 18 taken in conjunction with Articles 8 and 10 of the Convention that their rights were restricted for purposes other than those proscribed in the Convention.

They further requested that the Court strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 of the Convention. 22.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 of the Convention 8.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 of the Convention 8.     The applicants complained principally of the various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Article 10 of the Convention that his criminal conviction under section 7(2) of Law no. 3713 constituted a violation of his right to freedom of expression.

the Convention?

  34505/16) against the Republic of Serbia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 10 June 2016 by