CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-173479
28 février 2017
Has there been a breach of the applicant’s rights as guaranteed by Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention?
Page 22 sur 4049
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1211DEC000080304
11 décembre 2007
This aspect of the case must therefore be rejected pursuant to Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention. 2.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408DEC005352519
8 avril 2021
The applicant has HIV, stage 4, and during his detention he has developed a number of serious accompanying diseases. As of 20 March 2018, the applicant’s state of health deteriorated.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0904DEC002848503
4 septembre 2007
In relation to these complaints he invoked Articles 5 § 4, 6 § 1 and 6 § 3 (a) of the Convention.
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:CR00408
28 mars 2018
6 de la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme, 4 du protocole n° 7 annexé à cette convention, 225-5, 225-7, 225-10 du code pénal, préliminaire, 6, 591 et 593 du code de procédure pénale, du principe
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0211JUD004568122
11 février 2025
THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 7.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0524JUD006394500
24 mai 2006
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 27.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0405JUD003529205
5 avril 2011
The applicant alleged under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that generally State Security Courts were not independent and impartial. 39.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0708JUD003362906
8 juillet 2008
, in breach of Article 10 of the Convention. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD005508913
28 novembre 2017
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 40.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1119JUD001755102
19 novembre 2009
The applicant complained that his pre-trial detention had been unlawful, and relied on Article 5 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.
18° chambre 3ème section
69dd39d7cdc6046d471f21a4
13 avril 2026
De cette succession dépendait notamment un local commercial situé au rez-de-chaussée d'un immeuble en copropriété sis [Adresse 4] à [Localité 4], outre une cave en sous-sol.
soc
6137265ecd5801467742508b
23 mai 2001
Y... sur l'engagement à son encontre d'une procédure disciplinaire ne pouvait être considéré comme la manifestation d'un dol "eu égard à la variété des tâches lui incombant conventionnellement, dont une
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214DEC002775519
14 décembre 2021
Accordingly, both complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. 20.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0408DEC007509511
8 avril 2014
She relied on Articles 2, 3, 5 and 8 of the Convention. 20.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0414JUD002863105
14 avril 2009
He relied on Article 13 of the Convention. 25.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0116DEC002168193
16 janvier 1995
5 para. 4 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0426JUD002212193
26 avril 1994
Jungwiert (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 para. 4) (art. 43). 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0124DEC006550001
24 janvier 2006
She relied in that connection on Article 6 of the Convention. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0707JUD006012511
7 juillet 2015
They argued that the decisions, with the reasons given therein, had not provided them with the examination required by Article 13 taken together with Article 3 of the Convention ( M.S.S. v.