Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1215JUD004345202
15 décembre 2009
15 décembre 2009
impartial tribunal and that the outcome of the proceedings had been unfair.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1387575-1448799
29 juin 2005
29 juin 2005
years in the domestic courts had been excessive, and for compensation for the damage sustained in consequence.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-493872-495153
14 février 2002
14 février 2002
The case has been struck out following a friendly settlement in which 30,000 Danish kroner is to be paid for any non-pecuniary and pecuniary damage, costs and expenses.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0520JUD007583401
20 mai 2008
20 mai 2008
In their observations the lawyers for the applicant company referred to a number of documents which had been appended to the Ministry’s written defence arguments of 12 August 1994 but which had not been
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0823DEC002956806
23 août 2011
23 août 2011
The applicant claimed that the letter of 9 September 2004 had been written by someone else, because the mother could not write in Latin script, yet the letter had been written in Latin script.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0311DEC001829508
11 mars 2014
11 mars 2014
There is no information to suggest that the applicant has not been able to recover the sums due from the convicted person. 27.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0503DEC001617304
3 mai 2011
3 mai 2011
It noted that the sheds had been erected in a period when the owner of the land was the State and company H. had the authorisation of the State to build.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0524DEC005183807
24 mai 2011
24 mai 2011
According to the applicant, the monetary award has not been enforced to date.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2318353-2495906
8 avril 2008
8 avril 2008
Police officers who had been on duty at the time also stated that the applicants’ son had not been tortured: he had been found dead in his cell when they had gone there to offer him a cup of tea.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1927832-2024895
20 février 2007
20 février 2007
Yıldız Ölmez claimed that she had been arrested on 25 July 1993. Taken to the Istanbul security directorate, she had also been tortured there.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0903JUD002677107
3 septembre 2013
3 septembre 2013
expected to earn had the premises not been taken over by the Government.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2603889-2830680
14 janvier 2009
14 janvier 2009
Concurrently, they applied to the Tulcea Court of First Instance seeking a declaration that the nationalisation had been illegal.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2876737-3158015
29 septembre 2009
29 septembre 2009
On the opposite, Mr Constantin, claiming police incitement, stated that he had been informed of the covert operation, while Mr Stoian claimed that he had been tricked into accepting the money; both applicants
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2223122-2379647
8 janvier 2008
8 janvier 2008
The applicant alleged that he had been ill-treated prior to his release the following day.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68110-68578
24 mai 2000
24 mai 2000
In the Chapman case, by 18 votes to 9 that there had been no violation of Article 8, by 19 votes to 8 that there has been no violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, by 25 to 2 that there had been no
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920DEC005086709
20 septembre 2011
20 septembre 2011
As to the merits of the complaint under Article 14, the Government submitted that no evidence had been adduced by the applicant to show that any other person had been allowed to build beyond the height
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2777973-3050277
1 juillet 2009
1 juillet 2009
In 1999, following a sexual harassment case, Ms Čudak was dismissed by the Polish embassy in Lithuania, where she had been working as a receptionist and telephonist.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68077-68545
22 avril 1999
22 avril 1999
Complaints The applicant party complains that its right to freedom of association guaranteed under Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights has been infringed.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68019-68487
9 décembre 1998
9 décembre 1998
The Commission expressed the unanimous opinion in all cases that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and, in the Hood case, that there had also been a violation of Article 5 §§ 3 and 5.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0428JUD005453912
28 avril 2015
28 avril 2015
According to the Court’s case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred
Source officiellePage 23 sur 136