La présente requête a été déposée par Mme C... épouse A..., qui réside à Bejaia en Algérie et qui n’est pas représentée dans les conditions prévues aux dispositions de l’article R. 431-8 précité.

Mohand Larbi X..., demeurant village Tizi-Adjissa, commune de Smaoun, Daira d'Amizour, Wilaya de Béjaia (Algérie), en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 9 décembre 1983 par la cour d'appel de Paris (22e

Djamal X..., demeurant chez ... de Béjaïa (Algérie) ; M.

La présente requête a été déposée par Mme C épouse B qui réside à Bejaia en Algérie et qui n'est pas représentée dans les conditions prévues aux dispositions de l'article R. 431-8 précité.

application lodged on 12 March 2002, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Vladimir Viktorovich Tkachenko, is a Russian national who was born in 1963 and lives in the town of Belaya

By letter dated 17   April 2014 the Government’s friendly ‑ settlement proposal was forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit comments on behalf of the applicant

They bring this application on their own behalf and on behalf of their daughter Ms Lyudmila Nikolayevna Kiseleva, born in 1999, also a Russian national and a minor.

The application was lodged on its behalf by its General Director, Ms   S.   Rasulova. 2.

By a letter of 26 April 2019 the applicant’s representative was invited to submit by 7 June 2019 at the latest any written observations she might wish to make in reply on behalf of the applicant, together

In October 2020 Ms M.L. lodged the present application for and on behalf of the applicant.

There were exceptional circumstances in the present case which entitled the bank’s former chairman and majority shareholder to lodge a valid application on the bank’s behalf: preliminary objection rejected

The application was submitted by N.G. in her own name and on G.B.’s behalf, the latter having been detained at the time. G.B. was N.G.’s brother.

Law Article 34 (Locus standi of the grandparents to lodge an application on behalf of the grandchildren ): The children’s parents had never been deprived of parental responsibility nor were the children

On   24   January 2024 those observations were forwarded to BNR’s lawyer via the Court’s electronic communication service (“eComms”), and he was invited to submit observations in reply on behalf

Article 41 – EUR 45,000 for non-pecuniary damage, to be held by the applicant on her own behalf and on behalf of her three children.

She brought the application on her own behalf and on behalf of her daughter, Margarita Sergeyevna Kovaleva, born in 1989, also a Russian national.

  The applicant had incited his friend to commit espionage on behalf of the former German Democratic Republic.

The applicant had also gone to a bakery with a gun and asked for money on behalf of the terrorist organisation.

The first applicant lodged the application on his own behalf and on behalf of his daughter, who was underage at the material time. 7.