It is clear from the ruling of the Divisional Court that it did not regard it as appropriate for any such permission to be granted.

/06) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Russian national, Mr Eduard

They were unable to provide definite clues as to the disappearance of the ballistics evidence. 38 .

      Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan, 23/11/2009 Caution issued Caution targeted religious teaching without clear connection to violent or harmful activities.

According to Strasbourg case-law, it was clear that where several available remedies were available, the victim was not required to pursue more than one.

Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a British national, Mr Edward

Here, as in other fields to which the safeguards of the Convention extend, the national authorities accordingly enjoy a certain margin of appreciation (see, among many authorities, Edwards v.

It is therefore clear that he had been fully advised as to his legal rights when being questioned by the police.

However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Labita v.

But even without this letter it ought in reason to have been clear to the [applicant] that income can have an effect on the benefits. This ground of appeal therefore also fails.” 3.

  33 - 34; Edwards   v. the United Kingdom judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B,   pp. 34-35,   para. 34;   and   Saïdi   v.

In particular, the applicant submitted to the Court the relevant decisions which made clear that she could have retrieved the items after the enforcements acts had been annulled, had she decided to do

  Edvard Vogt, alors professeur associé de sociologie à l’université de Bergen, menèrent une enquête au sujet du phénomène de la violence à Bergen, ville de quelque 200   000 habitants.

Edgard PALLIERES, Conseiller M. Gurvan LE QUINQUIS, Conseiller qui en ont délibéré.

  On the basis of the medical evidence and interviews with various people who had known V., on 30 July 2010, the prosecutor decided to discontinue the investigation, on the grounds that it was clear

In a further domestic case, Edward Paul Tanti v Administrative Secretary (judgment of the Court of Appeal of 7 October 2005) it was held that a civil servant had a right to sue the Government as regards

lives of those within their jurisdiction (see, for example, L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom , 9   June 1998, §   36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 ‑ III, and Paul and Audrey Edwards

As noted by the national courts (see paragraphs 22 in fine and   25   in   fine above), it is far from clear that the proper course of action for them was to draw their handguns and fire

principle, be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey Edwards