CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

51 402 résultats pour « Helmer »

TousCC
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1981327-2102327

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2007

24 avril 2007

It therefore held, unanimously, that, in the case of B. , there had been no violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d)of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2189334-2328668

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2007

30 novembre 2007

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2264334-2425102

Admin. suprême

12 février 2008

12 février 2008

It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article   5 § 4 and also awarded Mr   Pyrak EUR   2,500 for non-pecuniary damage.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2055934-2175704

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2007

29 juin 2007

(Estonian), Renate Jaeger (German) and Volodymyr   Butkevych (Ukrainian) – took evidence from witnesses in Khmelnytsky (Ukraine) from Monday 25 to Wednesday 27 June 2007 in Izyaslav Prison and held

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68128-68596

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2000

3 octobre 2000

  After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2215107-2361810

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2007

12 décembre 2007

Poland judgment, the Court held that Poland was to take steps to ensure Bug River claimants in general were properly compensated as well as finding that there had been a violation of Article   1 of

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-67990-68458

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2001

22 janvier 2001

The group would be likely to focus on how any changes to the Convention could help the Court deal with its ever-increasing caseload.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68166-68634

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2001

25 janvier 2001

This was confirmed on 4 April 2000 by the Supreme Administrative Court which also held that such measures need not be reasoned.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68152-68620

Admin. suprême

2 février 2000

2 février 2000

He was held at Adana Security Directorate until about 1.00 a.m. on 29 April 1992, when he was taken to Adana State Hospital. He was declared dead on arrival.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-843398-863956

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2003

14 novembre 2003

In 1994, Nikolaj Slivenko, who still held Russian citizenship, retired from the Russian army and applied for a temporary residence permit.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68085-68553

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 1999

28 septembre 1999

  The Court subsequently decided that the hearing would be held in camera (Rule   33   §   2 of the Rules of Court).

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1662912-1742436

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2006

3 mai 2006

  In its Chamber judgment of 28 June 2005, the Court held, by four votes to three, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1725221-1808897

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2006

13 juillet 2006

  The Court therefore held unanimously in both cases that there had been a violation of Article 9.   Article 10 The Court held unanimously that no separate issue arose under Article 10.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCREFERRALS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1031668-1067172

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2004

17 juin 2004

In a judgment of 22 January 2004 (see press release no. 031) the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) to the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-443888-444575

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2001

13 novembre 2001

He submits that the terms held to be offensive were taken out of context and interpreted without that context being taken into account.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGHEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2263690-2414066

Admin. suprême

1 février 2008

1 février 2008

  In a judgment of 22 March 2007, the Court held, by four votes to three, that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention and awarded the applicant 5,759.96   euros   (EUR

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-462800-463706

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2001

13 décembre 2001

  The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (determination of civil rights within a reasonable time) of the European Convention on Human

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68194-68662

Admin. suprême

17 mai 1999

17 mai 1999

Italy (application no. 36719/97)     The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3759

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2005

5 juillet 2005

In August 2000 a meeting had been held with the applicant's battalion, at which the commanders had told the soldiers they had not fought well.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-509313-510689

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2002

1 mars 2002

It also held, unanimously, that no separate issue arose under Article   6 § 1 in respect of the length of the proceedings. The applicants were awarded 10,000 euros for non-pecuniary damage.

Source officielle

Page 23 sur 2571

← PrécédentSuivant →