CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

42 695 résultats pour « Alefeld »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CA

4eme Chambre Section 2

659e4ace5537980008847451

Appel

9 janvier 2024

9 janvier 2024

Société BPOUT GMBH société à responsabilité limitée de droit allemand, prise en la personne de son représentant légal, domiciliée es qualités audit siège sis [Adresse 2] Représentée par Me Peter ALEFELD

Source officielle

Page 24 sur 2135

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1031JUD004585512

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2017

31 octobre 2017

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION 31.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0129JUD000175003

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2009

29 janvier 2009

    The applicant’s arrest and alleged ill-treatment 1.     The alleged ill-treatment 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0113JUD001430717

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2026

13 janvier 2026

Applicant’s arrest and alleged ill-treatment 4 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-158172

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2015

28 septembre 2015

    The alleged acts of torture and ill-treatment in the Gldani prison 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1123DEC002465106

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2021

23 novembre 2021

Accordingly, the Court cannot establish that he had an arguable claim in respect of his alleged ill-treatment after the arrest or made a credible assertion.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1130DEC004767209

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2010

30 novembre 2010

    The Court raised of its own motion a complaint under Article 8 of the Convention concerning the alleged censorship of the applicant’s correspondence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520JUD006946614

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2021

20 mai 2021

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5874

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2000

7 décembre 2000

The alleged father having failed to appear despite being summoned, the court ruled against him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181775

Admin. suprême

20 février 2018

20 février 2018

Communicated on 20 February 2018   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 46928/07 Oleg Mykolayovych GOLUBENKO against Ukraine lodged on 23 October 2007 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns an alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-219838

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2022

12 septembre 2022

concerns the death of the applicant’s brother after falling into a coma due to trauma-induced brain damage which revealed itself ten days following his arrest and questioning at the police station and the alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192728

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2019

28 mars 2019

font-style:italic }   Communicated on 28 March 2019   SECOND SECTION Application no. 29386/09 Hamdi AKIN against Turkey lodged on 6 May 2009 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-189910

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2019

16 janvier 2019

January 2019   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 54292/18 Suliko LIPARTIA and Giorgi BERDZENISHVILI against Georgia lodged on 8 November 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-220234

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2022

27 septembre 2022

Cyprus lodged on 3 June 2022 communicated on 27 September 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns allegations of insufficient or ineffective criminal investigations into the applicant’s alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-228194

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2023

22 septembre 2023

When separately convicting his alleged co-perpetrators, the court named the applicant and made, as it later said, “very specific references to [his] direct and clear involvement in the crimes committed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229732

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2023

29 novembre 2023

Application no. 40633/15 FEDERATION OF TRADE UNIONS OF CHERNIGIV REGION against Ukraine lodged on 11 August 2015 communicated on 29 November 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-237920

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2024

11 octobre 2024

xa0; FOURTH SECTION Application no. 34122/23 Joel LEOCÁDIO DE LEMOS against Portugal lodged on 4 September 2023 communicated on 11 October 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-83700

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2007

31 octobre 2007

inhuman and degrading treatment (complaint under Article 3), the alleged violation of the applicants' right to respect for their private and family life (complaint under Article 8), the length of certain

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4507

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2004

15 janvier 2004

The Government generally denied the applicant’s version of the events and alleged that her husband was a PKK sympathiser who had changed his identity and probably joined that organisation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3712

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2005

27 septembre 2005

Moreover, they alleged that the father, the first applicant, would not be safe if returned to Bosnia and Herzegovina as he had been involved as a member of a police unit in the arrest of a mafia criminal

Source officielle