The applicant contends under Articles 9 and 10 of the Convention that the first-instance court convicted him on the basis of his submissions concerning Abdullah Öcalan.

The soldiers saw him running and opened fire. Abdülmenaf Kaya ran towards Çiftlibahçe village and hid in some bushes. The soldiers gave chase and found him.

On 26 March 1996 the applicant requested the Governor that his electronic equipment be returned to him.

The applicant refused to have a lawyer assigned to him ex officio and stated that his brother and girl-friend should appoint a lawyer to represent him.

to his forehead and forcing him to confess.

He was punched, kicked and hit with a truncheon, including on his soles.

In particular, between August and November 2006 the applicant requested the Donetsk Regional Court of Appeal to provide him with a copy of his indictment.

dependence”, and coercing him into actions against his will.

He was aware that his son, who had not seen him for a long time, needed time to get used to him again. He was ready to change his place of work to be able to adapt better to his son’s schedule.

Several guards attacked him from behind and he was forced down on the floor. His was repeatedly hit to his back while handcuffs were put on him.

Nor had they specified whether there had been any public interest in forcing him to perform his military service at such an advanced age.

The charges read out to him on 14 November 1996 pertained to his possession of information with intent to use it for terrorist purposes and were consistent with the line of questioning pursued by the police

They subjected him to various forms of violence, such as punching and kicking him, blocking his airway by covering his mouth and nose with a rag, and tying him up in a painful position.

Having been unable to support his body weight during the trip, the applicant fell and hit his head and back a number of times. He was immediately taken back to the detention facility.

  1 to the Convention, that the police officers involved in his arrest unlawfully dispossessed him of his personal belongings which, subsequently, were lost. 5.

E.R. forbade the child from communicating with her father, sitting close to him, holding hands with him, kissing him or going into his car.

According to him his legal representative reassured him that he could live the country and that they could request an adjournment of the hearing of 9 October 2007. 9.

He had been afraid of the police and for that reason he had not reported the deaths of V. and Sh. and had buried them in his yard. After his arrest the police officers had not beaten him. 32.