CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-200415
18 décembre 2019
On 21 March 2008 the Izmir Cadastral Court dismissed the case in line with the findings of the last cadastral work, concluding that the impugned plots had been registered to the Treasury due to the applicant
Page 24 sur 819
ECLI:CEDH:001-181528
15 février 2018
The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CEDH:001-142193
4 mars 2014
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913DEC001242404
13 septembre 2016
In the application form which followed, section 1 carried the name of the publishing house and section 2 carried the name of the newspaper.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2168273-2304814
15 novembre 2007
On one occasion in March 2006 he was summoned to Zavodskoy District Prosecutor’s Office and he was informed that the investigation had been resumed but was not given access to the case file.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113JUD004104011
13 janvier 2015
Article 332 Clarifications, exceptions and requests “ (1) If the court observes before the judicial-investigation stage of the proceedings has ended that the criminal investigation of the case was carried
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1217JUD007106412
17 décembre 2020
In the case of Močuļskis v.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1481016-1552607
18 octobre 2005
An autopsy was carried out on the same day.
ECLI:CEDH:001-162984
21 avril 2016
In a judgment of 5 March 2003 the Regional Commercial Court dismissed the company’s action finding, inter alia , the agreement null and void ex tunc .
comm
613723e7cd5801467740fab8
22 octobre 2002
frères SA (la société Castel) a été condamnée à payer à M.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1210DEC001094984
10 décembre 1986
She has filed a previous application (N° 9190/80) which the Commission declared inadmissible on 11 March 1982. The present case relates to new and different facts. I.
ECLI:CEDH:001-111920
14 juin 2012
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants and as they appear from the documents submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13839
18 octobre 2022
In his submission, that check had only been carried out because of his dark skin colour and thus on racial grounds.
ECLI:CEDH:001-233374
28 mars 2024
2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0914DEC000203714
14 septembre 2015
The first applicant was released on 2 March 2012 at about 4 p.m. The second applicant was arrested on 2 March 2012 and taken to the Police Station.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0310DEC003867407
10 mars 2015
The circumstances of the case 2. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.
ECLI:CEDH:001-202235
10 mars 2020
2020 Published on 30 March 2020 FIFTH SECTION Application no. 61555/12 Mykhaylo Yevgenovych YERESKO against Ukraine and 3 other applications (see list appended) SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications
ECLI:CEDH:001-145156
26 mai 2014
On 4 March 2010 the Krakow Regional Court allowed the appeals and remitted the case (IV Ka 87/10).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1015JUD004902008
15 octobre 2020
The events of 1-2 March 2008 and institution of criminal cases 8.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-87762
25 juin 2008
and DECIDES to close the examination of this case.