CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

16 369 résultats pour « Marc CASSIEDE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-200415

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2019

18 décembre 2019

On 21 March 2008 the Izmir Cadastral Court dismissed the case in line with the findings of the last cadastral work, concluding that the impugned plots had been registered to the Treasury due to the applicant

Source officielle

Page 24 sur 819

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181528

Admin. suprême

15 février 2018

15 février 2018

The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142193

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2014

4 mars 2014

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913DEC001242404

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2016

13 septembre 2016

In the application form which followed, section   1 carried the name of the publishing house and section   2 carried the name of the newspaper.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2168273-2304814

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2007

15 novembre 2007

On one occasion in March 2006 he was summoned to Zavodskoy District Prosecutor’s Office and he was informed that the investigation had been resumed but was not given access to the case file.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113JUD004104011

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2015

13 janvier 2015

Article 332 Clarifications, exceptions and requests “ (1) If the court observes before the judicial-investigation stage of the proceedings has ended that the criminal investigation of the case was carried

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1217JUD007106412

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2020

17 décembre 2020

In the case of Močuļskis v.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1481016-1552607

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2005

18 octobre 2005

An autopsy was carried out on the same day.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-162984

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2016

21 avril 2016

In a judgment of 5 March 2003 the Regional Commercial Court dismissed the company’s action finding, inter alia , the agreement null and void ex tunc .

Source officielle
CC

comm

613723e7cd5801467740fab8

Cassation

22 octobre 2002

22 octobre 2002

frères SA (la société Castel) a été condamnée à payer à M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1210DEC001094984

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 1986

10 décembre 1986

  She has filed a previous application (N° 9190/80) which the Commission declared inadmissible on 11 March 1982.   The present case relates to new and different facts.   I.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111920

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2012

14 juin 2012

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants and as they appear from the documents submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13839

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2022

18 octobre 2022

In his submission, that check had only been carried out because of his dark skin colour and thus on racial grounds.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-233374

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2024

28 mars 2024

2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0914DEC000203714

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2015

14 septembre 2015

The first applicant was released on 2 March 2012 at about 4 p.m. The second applicant was arrested on 2 March 2012 and taken to the Police Station.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0310DEC003867407

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2015

10 mars 2015

    The circumstances of the case 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202235

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2020

10 mars 2020

2020 Published on 30 March 2020   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 61555/12 Mykhaylo Yevgenovych YERESKO against Ukraine and 3 other applications (see list appended) SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-145156

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2014

26 mai 2014

On 4 March 2010 the Krakow Regional Court allowed the appeals and remitted the case (IV Ka 87/10).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1015JUD004902008

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2020

15 octobre 2020

The events of 1-2 March 2008 and institution of criminal cases 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-87762

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2008

25 juin 2008

and   DECIDES to close the examination of this case.

Source officielle