CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1022DEC005798400
22 octobre 2002
Consequently, States are dispensed from answering for their acts before an international body before they have had an opportunity to put matters right through their own legal system.
Page 24 sur 29
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0125JUD003887903
25 janvier 2011
Deux policiers tenaient le bâton par les deux bouts ; je ne pouvais pas bouger.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0131JUD006218700
31 janvier 2006
It observed that, pursuant to sections 3 and 4 (1) of the 1969 Act, damage resulting from a wrongful official decision could only be compensated if that decision had been quashed by the competent body
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0921DEC003688797
21 septembre 1999
He is represented by Mr Michael Farrell, a solicitor practising in Dublin. The facts as submitted by the parties may be summarised as follows. A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1105JUD003599997
5 novembre 2002
Furthermore, Chapter 16, Section 5, of the Code of Judicial Procedure provided: “When it is important to wait for a decision of another tribunal or some other body before a decision is given in a pending
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0409DEC002647595
9 avril 1997
Relevant domestic law There is no specific body of rules of the Supreme Court providing for special procedures in Multi-Party Actions.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0530DEC003184796
30 mai 2000
Article 243 of the Turkish Criminal Code provides: “A President or member of a court or official body or any other public official who, in order to extract a confession of guilt in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0314DEC000821502
14 mars 2006
Article 35 also requires that the complaints intended to be made subsequently before the Court should have been made to the appropriate domestic body, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1115JUD006717501
15 novembre 2005
Firstly, the term “court” in that provision designated a body independent of the executive and the parties to the case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0327DEC007221901
27 mars 2003
:inline-block } .sD388262A { width:212.48pt; display:inline-block } .sDEA786DA { width:210.67pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 72219/01 by Michael
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0926DEC006383100
26 septembre 2002
Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Tony Michael
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1025JUD001178785
25 octobre 1990
The first applicant, Mr Michael Keith Thynne, is a British citizen, born in 1951. 10.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177246
30 août 2017
Ms Tamara MUKHMADOVA 1940 Russian Elistanzhi, Chechen Republic Numerous shrapnel wounds, abrasions and hematomas of the body.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0313DEC004113898
13 mars 2001
The autopsy report found that he died as a result of direct blows by blunt objects causing 89 lesions on his body (arms broken, multiple fractures of his ribs and thorax, multiple traumatisms and
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1020JUD001327905
20 octobre 2011
Egbert Myjer, David Thór Björgvinsson, George Nicolaou, Luis López Guerra, Nona Tsotsoria, Ann Power-Forde, Işıl Karakaş, Guido Raimondi, judges, and Michael
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD002702108
7 juillet 2011
Mijović, Davíd Thór Björgvinsson, Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, George Nicolaou, Luis López Guerra, Ledi Bianku, Ann Power, Mihai Poalelungi, judges , and Michael
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0330JUD003604817
30 mars 2021
the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a British national, Mr Edward Michael
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1214DEC004016706
14 décembre 2011
Elisabet Fura, Alvina Gyulumyan, Khanlar Hajiyev, Egbert Myjer, Sverre Erik Jebens, Giorgio Malinverni, George Nicolaou, Luis López Guerra, judges, and Michael
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1021JUD004275009
21 octobre 2013
Bianku, Ann Power-Forde, Işıl Karakaş, Paul Lemmens, Paul Mahoney, Aleš Pejchal, Johannes Silvis, Valeriu Griţco, Faris Vehabović, judges , and Michael
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0909REP001692290
9 septembre 1993
Michael Gnesda, lawyer. 9. At the close of the hearing the Commission declared the application admissible. 10.