Thus, he failed to take the opportunity to attend the hearing of the police officers, where he could have challenged the veracity of their allegations.

Zupančič, President,   Helena Jäderblom,   Aleš Pejchal, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar .

have been known to that party, request the Court ... to revise that judgment.” 8.

We have no doubt that the judge would have refused an application made on that basis.

The terms of this provision suggest that the judgment will be quashed on appeal. c) More than twenty actions brought by ourselves and Mr Philis have already been dismissed with final effect. d) The T.E.E

The applicant lastly complained, under Article 13, that he did not have any effective remedy at his disposal as regards his complaints under Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention.

la SELAS VERSUS, [Adresse 2] DEFENDERESSE * SAS [Adresse 3] comparaissant par Maîtr Marie-Claire LETARD, Avocat à la Cour L'affaire a été entendue en audience publique le 2 octobre 2025 par : Philippe

Firstly, in his view, the road could have been covered with sand, as it was the end of the winter time. Secondly, he argued that the road could have been slippery.

did not have direct access to a court for the determination of his civil rights.

  According to paragraph 1, the Agency shall have legal personality.

Accordingly, in order to exhaust domestic remedies, the applicant would have had to lodge his State liability claim within the statutory time-limit.

June 1997 Philis v.

par une chambre qui siégera dans la composition suivante   :   Jean-Paul Costa (Français), président , Willi Fuhrmann (Autrichien), Loukis Loucaides (Cypriote), Nicolas Bratza (Britannique), Hanne

Throughout their stay in Russia the applicants have not taken any steps to regularise their status and must have been aware of the insecurity of the situation created by the lack of lawful grounds for

The applicant’s victim status thus depends on whether compensation for damages should have been afforded in the particular circumstances of the present case. 16.

It further takes the view that the applicant must have sustained non-pecuniary damage as a result of the violation found.

Such conduct on the part of the applicants might have resulted in the inevitable loss of important material evidence. 32.

] né le 08 Avril 1958 à [Localité 10] Retraité, demeurant [Adresse 4] Monsieur [Z] [O], [K] [E] né le 20 Novembre 1960 à [Localité 10] Retraité, demeurant [Adresse 8] représentés par Me François-philippe

Philippe VALLEIX, Président M.

(Pays Bas) Rijksweg - 126 HUMMELO (Pays Bas) Madame Elisabeth Hélène VAN Y... épouse VAN DER D... née le 08 Septembre 1939 à LA HAYE (Pays Bas) Frankenslag 4 - 9999 LA HAYE (Pays Bas) Monsieur Robert