Section 14 of the Press Act 1984 reads: “1.

s4D040A4F { width:9.67pt; display:inline-block } .sDED2D3D2 { width:174.6pt; display:inline-block } .s5B081A9D { width:168.28pt; display:inline-block }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 9938/05 Renad

Rezard, premier conseiller, M. Lautard-Mattioli, conseiller. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 6 octobre 2023. La présidente-rapporteure, K.

Rezard, premier conseiller, Mme Berland, première conseillère. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 21 mars 2025. La présidente rapporteure, K.

Rezard, premier conseiller, Mme Berland, première conseillère. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 21 mars 2025. La présidente-rapporteure, K.

At the close of the hearing the court read out the operative provisions of the judgment, in which it stated that it was dismissing the applicant’s claims on the basis of Article 1064 of the Civil Code.

Gholam Reza A ; Vu la demande, enregistrée le 20 décembre 2007 au greffe du tribunal administratif de Paris, présentée par M. A, demeurant ... ; M.

The applicant complains under Article 14 of the Convention, read in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 or Article 8, that she was refused the housing subsidy on discriminatory grounds.

    At the hearing held on 2 December 2013, the trial judge read out all the witness statements.

The Regional Court read out statements of three witnesses made at the pre-trial stage. The applicant’s counsel objected to the reading out of the statements. No witnesses were heard. 11.

Article 267 § 1 reads: “The defendant has the right to ... 3) submit requests; ... (11) appeal against the judgment and decisions of a court.”

It was stated that “[his] deposition was read out pursuant to Article 286 of the Code of Criminal Procedure”.

Letters shall not be read, unless this is necessary for the purpose of preventing crime or there is reason to suspect that the prisoner's right to send and receive correspondence is being abused.

The Supreme Court's decision reads as follows:     (Translation)     "From the facts of the case it follows that [the applicant's] registered address in Germany was a rented room.

  7/1996) read as follows: Section 1 “Section 180 of the Civil Obligations Act (the Official Gazette nos. 53/91, 73/91 and 3/94) shall be repealed.”

Subsequently, it read out some documents, including the documents that the applicant had requested to add to the file (see paragraph 7 above). These included the pretrial statements of D.V. and M.S.

The evidence given by L. before the investigating judge was then read out.         The trial court considered L.'

The relevant part of that decision reads as follows: “...this statement is certainly offensive for the court and the judge [concerned] and is as such unacceptable in the communication between the court

    Code of Criminal Procedure Article 133 of the Code reads as follows: “§ 1.

    Domestic law and practice The relevant provisions of Law no. 435 on the Administrative decentralisation read as follows: “Article 12.