They had this right because they were directly affected by the ordinance without the intervention of a judicial or administrative decision.

Thus, they could be subjected to the measures under section 54(4b) of the SPA. (c)    The third party 54.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties and as they appear from the documents, may be summarised as follows.

and the judgment recorded in the margin of the entries thus invalidated.

The impugned interference was intended to combat money laundering and related criminal offences, thus pursuing the legitimate aim of the prevention of disorder and the prevention of crime.

The way in which they had treated the children was incompatible with the provisions of the Convention and exceeded the minimum level of severity required to fall within the scope of Article   3.

La société [A] est propriétaire des véhicules loués à la société THT.

The Committee furthermore noted that the information on V.M.M.’s holdings had not been available at the time of the trial, and had thus been unknown to the applicant.

By a decision of 4 November 1997, the Court of Appeal rejected this claim, stating that, under the provisions of the Reindeer Husbandry Act, they had the necessary legal capacity.

  Reasonableness of the length of the proceedings Complexity of the case: although case of some complexity this alone could not justify considerable length of proceedings.

They also argued that they needed the apartment for their own use. The applicants requested that the court provide them with the necessary compensation for the damage they had suffered. 16.

To this they added default interest, calculated in accordance with the national rules.

similar violations; this information appears in the appendix to this resolution;     Assessment by the Committee of Ministers:   Welcoming the reforms of the supervisory review (“ nadzor

Once the Constitutional Court refused this request, they could file a request with the Constitutional Court under Article 138 of the Federal Constitution for determination in the case where two courts

The refusal by the Belgian courts to examine the undercover officers had thus been based on serious grounds.

They sent registered letters refusing to take part on the grounds that the elections were manifestly unconstitutional.

Thus, given the compensation awarded and the fact that the tenants had not been evicted, they considered that they were still victims of the violation upheld by the domestic courts.

Moreover, the applicants had eventually been awarded triple the sum which had been offered to them at the time of the expropriation and were still to receive 5% interest on the amount, thus they were not

The Government thus offers, by this unilateral declaration, to pay the applicant, EUR   500 (five hundred euros) to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, plus

They considered that this approach had violated the principle of legal certainty. 26.