The applicant consulted the case file and submitted his comments on the statements of several witnesses at the pre-trial stage.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

In addition, the expert was working in the context of judicial proceedings, supervised by a judge, who remained responsible for the preparation and speedy conduct of the trial (see Stojanov v. the former

    On 7 February 2005 the applicants lodged with the Kraków Court of   Appeal a complaint about a breach of the right to a trial within a   reasonable time.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

The prosecution merely argued that the applicant and his lawyers had not complained about the videotaping until the trial. 30.

It also read out the evidence compiled at the pre ‑ trial investigation stage, including witness statements and the verbatim records of the reconstruction of events.

provisionally examining the criminal charges laid against a person and of establishing the facts to the extent necessary to decide whether to discontinue the criminal proceedings or to commit the person for trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

In that connection, the court held that there had been no breach of the right to a fair trial within a reasonable time in the period after 17 September 2004. II.

Furthermore, the Government failed to explain why, in order to ensure the right to a fair trial within a reasonable time, the applicant should have appealed against the court's decisions to carry out the