On this date the conciliatory stage ended without an agreement between the parties. 9.

    Tort proceedings against the State 19.

admission. 1.

    Admission to the hospital – 22 July to 5 December 1997 11.

In his statements Mr K. provided a detailed description of events on 27 February 2007 and corroborated the prosecution's version.   - statements by police officer Za., made in open court.

The Court’s decision on this preliminary issue at this stage of the proceedings was without prejudice to the issues of attribution and responsibility of the respondent State under the Convention for the

constitute admissible evidence. 23.

    The trial court considered the statements given at the hearing by T.H. and T.I. as untruthful, and based its judgment on the statements they had given at the pre-trial investigation stage

or at a later stage (see Lüdi v.

Prison staff at Glina State Prison had resorted twice to such placement over the preceding two months with the aim of persuading recalcitrant inmates to provide urine for drug tests ... 56.

However, the evidence given by M.K. during the investigation and trial stages and V.Ç. during his police interview (held on the same day the applicant had made his police statements) and the reconstruction

false, including the incriminating statements in question.

statements had been obtained using methods of coercion or oppression and that their admission to the case file, relied upon by the trial court, therefore constituted a violation of the fair trial guarantee

As to the applicant, he signed each page of his statement and added a note at the end: “This has been accurately written from my words, and I am willing to repeat my statements in court”.

Her diagnosis was recorded as stage IV HIV, stage II cervical cancer, chronic, low level hepatitis C, and hepatomegaly.

condamné à des réparations civiles ; Vu les mémoires produits en demande et en défense ; Sur le moyen unique de cassation, pris de la violation de l'article 6 1 et de l'article 2 du protocole additionnel

    Stay of criminal proceedings 54.

    As regards the complaint about the admission as evidence of the statements of G.B. and V.T. 47.

In addition, there were contra-indications in respect of the first and second applicants.

It appears that the applicant was able to receive a copy of the decision at a later stage. 23 .