of the European Court of Human Rights in the Akin case delivered on 4 July 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers on the same date under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Dunan case delivered on 30 October 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Kaplan case delivered on 26 February 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Konček case delivered on 26 November 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Linard case delivered on 25   June 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; &

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Perié case delivered on 26 September 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers on the same date under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Fanelli case delivered on 8 March 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Demirtepe case delivered on 21 December 1999 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Themudo Barata case delivered on 21 June 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Ivars case delivered on 30   October   2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Eerola case delivered on 6   May 2003 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Fonseca Carreira case delivered on 14 June 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that on 30 September 2002 the government of the respondent state had paid the applicants

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Ait-Said case delivered on 16 January 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Klavdianos case delivered on 17 October 2000 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Z.E. and others case delivered on 7 June 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Dindaroğlu and others case delivered on 26 June 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Mikulski case delivered on 6 June 2000 and transmitted on the same date to the Committee of Ministers in accordance with Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling

Court of Human Rights in the Köksal case delivered on 20 March 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the case originated