.. xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 49700 LES ULMES Convoqué, Représenté par Maître Jean Albert FUHRER, avocat au barreau d'ANGERS, INTIMEE : SA DES TRAVAUX PUBLICS DES PAYS DE LOIRE (TPPL) Rue Mabileau BP 55

He alleged that there had been violations of Article 5, Article 6 §§ 1 and 2 and Article 13 of the Convention. 25.

and Article 1 of Protocol No.

    Costs and expenses 59.

APPLICATION OF ARTICLE   41 OF THE CONVENTION 27.

    Costs and expenses 52.

    Costs and expenses 55.     The applicant claimed EUR 3,303.38 (excluding VAT) for costs incurred in the Convention proceedings. 56.

by those of Article 6 § 1 (see, notably, Osu v.

In conclusion, there had been a failure to comply with the procedural obligation imposed by Article 2. Conclusion : violation (unanimously).

Thus, while the rental value of the property on the open market increased by around 55 %, the rent paid by the tenants lagged behind.

him under Article 105 of the Code of Obligations.

There has accordingly been a breach of Article 6 § 1. II.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 49.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION AND ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL NO. 1 9.

Admissibility 55.

Russia , no. 42182/11, §§ 53-55, 2 June 2020). 11.

  Bulgaria , no. 12655/09, §§ 44-55, 3 March 2015). 4.     Under Article 41 of the Convention the applicants sought just satisfaction.

. 1 and Article 47 (art. 32-1, art. 47) of the Convention.

    It follows that there has been a violation of Article 3 taken in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention. 18.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 23.