Moldova (application no. 25464/05) The applicant, Alexandru Gavrilovici, is a Moldovan national who was born in 1954 and lives in Palanca (Moldova).

In view of the findings in paragraphs 8-11 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE   41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.

In view of the findings in the above paragraphs, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.

In view of the findings in paragraphs 9-11 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE   41 OF THE CONVENTION 13.

Neither “Ruslan” nor the applicant’s dealer were arrested or prosecuted, allegedly on the grounds that their identities could not be established. 11.

It will therefore continue to deal with these applications at the heirs’ request (see the appended table for details).

    On 27 September 2010 the Timişoara Military Prosecutor’s Office decided that the Prosecutor’s Office of the Arad County Court should deal with the case because the two police officers in

; September 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 5   July 2016 as a Chamber composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Kristina Pardalos,   Ganna Yudkivska,   Linos-Alexandre

#xa0; November 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

2013 as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

    Following lengthy negotiations in Parliament and the State Diet ( Landtag ) of Carinthia, an amendment to section 12 of the Ethnic Minorities Act, which deals with road signs in areas where

    The Constitutional Court declined to deal with the applicant’s joint complaint for lack of prospect of success.

In view of the above findings, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 15.

    Mr Fabrizio Rampinelli and Mr Alessandro Dal Molin These two applicants met in July 1993 and immediately entered into a committed and stable relationship with each other.

In particular, it is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention

Elle correspond en premier lieu à l’indemnisation à hauteur de 200.000 euros de la pénibilité et au sentiment de dévalorisation tenant aux constatations de l’expert et au fait que M.

COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Mme Isabelle Defarge, présidente de chambre Mme Alexandra Berger, conseillère Mme Marie-Pierre Fournier, magistrate à titre honoraire GREFFIER : Mme

xa0; Having deliberated;        Decides as follows:   THE FACTS        The applicant is an Italian national currently residing in Acqui Terme, Alessandria