It will therefore confine its examination to the question of whether the proceedings in their entirety were fair (see Edwards v. the United Kingdom , 16   December 1992, §§ 33-34, Series A no. 247

indicated that where incriminating statements made during police interrogation without access to a lawyer were used for a conviction, it would only be appropriate to quash that conviction if it was clear

However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see Ireland v. the United Kingdom , 18 January

    The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the “speediness” requirement of Article   5   §   4 of the Convention in respect of

la législation américaine prévoyait plusieurs possibilités de réduire une peine à perpétuité   : « Regarding the question of commutation of a life sentence, the United States wishes to make it clear

  235-B, pp. 32-33, § 32; the Edwards v. the United Kingdom judgment of 16   December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, §   34). 46.

Where it is clear from the outset, however, that no effective remedy is available to the applicant, the period runs from the date of the acts or measures complained of, or from the date of knowledge of

Government referred to the Court’s case-law which recognised that the need to protect the public interest may justify withholding certain evidence from the defence in criminal proceedings (amongst others, Edwards

Where it is clear from the outset however that no effective remedy is available to the applicant, the period runs from the date of the acts or measures complained of, or from the date of knowledge of that

However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact.

[I]t is clear that a judge would be acting contrary to the will of Parliament if he were to hold in the exercise of his discretion under section 11(3) of the 1991 Act that an admission made by a terrorist

To assess this evidence, the Court adopts the standard of proof “ beyond reasonable doubt” but adds that such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences

courts overruled the investigator’s decisions terminating the criminal proceedings and declared them unlawful cannot deprive the applicant of his victim status under the Convention, as there was no clear

importance, given that the essential purpose of such an investigation is to secure the effective implementation of the domestic laws which protect the right to life (see mutatis mutandis , Paul and Audrey Edwards

Where it is clear from the outset however that no effective remedy is available to the applicant, the period runs from the date of the acts or measures complained of, or from the date of knowledge of that

which operates against a wide spectrum (e.g. in relation to its effect on post-tariff discretionary life prisoners, and those detained under some provision of the Mental Health Act 1983), but, as is clear

  In a report on its visit to Turkey between 16 and 29 March 2004 (CPT/Inf (2005) 18), the CPT stated the following: “[i]n the reports on its visits in 1997 and September 2001, the CPT has made clear

Edwards ,   Adviser ; (b)     for the applicant Mr H. Southey QC , Ms H. Hill QC ,   Counsel , Mr A. Straw , Ms H. Wistrich, Ms M.Willis Stewart,   Advisers .   11.

An applicant has to become active once it is clear that no effective investigation will be provided, in other words once it becomes apparent that the respondent State will not fulfil its obligation under