At the same time, they had not verified the statements of facts that had formed the basis for those inferences and had not analysed whether the deficiencies alleged had indeed existed, most notably whether

when they had come across a group of soldiers with whom they had had an armed clash.

The press had had an iron cube on it.

The police had been well aware of the situation as it had been developing as the applicant had called them numerous times and they had come and inspected the scene, and been able to observe that he, in

Given that the warders had continued hitting him even when he had complied with the order to leave his cell and had fallen to the floor, the use of rubber truncheons against the applicant had been a form

which her son had only been a witness and she had not had any procedural status.

Once he had been given a liquid to drink which made him sick and he had thrown up. Then he had been given some pills that he had spat out. The officers had also tortured him with electric shocks.

2018, when he had entered the country de facto , the applicant had submitted an asylum application at the border, had been brought before the liberties and detention judge, had then appealed against the

When he had moved closer, he had seen a group of people who had been beating the applicant, while his mother had tried to protect him.

The police officer who had fired the shot had therefore enjoyed considerable autonomy of action and had had opportunities to take ill-considered initiatives, which would probably not have been the case

It had only been when he had been detained in other cells (from 29 March until 20 May 2013) that he had had to be assisted by his cellmates.

Before shooting, he had called out and had held his weapon in such a way that it was visible from outside the jeep.

The interpretation which had concluded that there had existed such a statutory power in those circumstances had been both novel and expansive and had been contrary to the principle of legal certainty,

her pregnancy had been confirmed.

not mean that the prosecution had had no intention of bringing the applicant before the competent legal authority.

In fact, contrary to the requirements of Article   347 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the other men who had lined up with him had all looked healthy, had had full heads of hair, had been clean

to place him under house arrest, had had no connection to the objectives of criminal justice.

A medical committee found that the treatment the applicant had received had been appropriate and that death had occurred following foreseeable complications.