Il résulte de l’instruction que la soirée « Dark Halloween » organisée par l’association « What The Fest » présente un caractère exclusivement artistique et culturel.

Subject to the fulfilment of what is stated under   a . above and provided that the Aliens Appeals Board would grant Mr Korosh Hatami a residence permit and quash the expulsion order, the government

With regard to Article 35 of the Convention (as for Article   13), what was decisive was whether, and to what extent, a breach by the respondent State of its obligation to carry out an effective investigation

that he had told [the court] what he had concluded from their conversation.

However, Maltese law did not provide what was necessary for identification, only what was not necessary, thus leaving it to the judge to decide according to his discretion.

I am defending a very serious case; I felt that I was interrupted in my cross-examination and said what I said.

[A.G.]: ... this is what the mayor says, that everything is false ...

Applicant: Then what do you need? V.H. : I already explained.

Each convict is also aware, from the outset of his sentence, what he must do to be considered for release and under what conditions.

regarding what the Court had usually found acceptable or not in cases relating to individual disputes.

  (b)     What activities involving the applicant were conducted in the above-mentioned time span (between 15 April and 1 October 2006), at what facilities/premises of what law-enforcement

they had seen, thought there was a Nazi element – not least because that is what they wanted to believe.

he had read what was written on the forum in question and demonstrating that he had regarded what was written there as insulting to a specific individual or individuals, which led him to the decision

What was the applicant’s post in the police at the material time? May equivalent posts be held by policewomen?  

In particular, what was the reason for the delayed service of the writ of execution in her case? Did the courts provide sufficient reasons for such a delay by way of a reasoned judgement? 2.

To what extent are the duties and responsibilities inherent in the applicant’s profession and social role relevant to his claim and the State’s margin of appreciation in this field?

In particular, did the national law as in force at the material time clearly define what constituted “pornography” and which acts amounted to “unlawful” as opposed to lawful distribution of pornography

In particular, what measures were put in place by the authorities in this respect?

In particular: -     What legitimate aim was pursued by the applicable legislation and the applicant’s prosecution on the basis of that legislation?