The Government maintained that she had been in a state of “average intoxication”. 9.

    During the trial the applicant was represented by State-appointed counsel, Mr A. 8.

The provisions of the decree are not applicable to technical assistance or cooperation staff placed at the disposal of foreign States.

taken to immobilise him and the lack of ensuing supervision of his state of health.

Le grief n'est pas de nature à permettre l'admission du pourvoi au sens de l'article 567-1-1 du code de procédure pénale. Sur le moyen, pris en sa seconde branche Enoncé du moyen 10.

  Nasopoulou, Advisers at the State Legal Council, and Ms   V.   Stroubouli, Legal Assistant at the State Legal Council. 3.

En revanche, il implique qu’il soit procédé au réexamen de sa demande d’admission au séjour.

obtained an authorisation or a right to stay in that Member State; ...”

The Court must therefore declare it admissible. B.     Merits 23.

    The State Treasury shall be liable for damage caused by a State official in the course of carrying out the duties entrusted to him.” 23.

    The applicant alleged, in particular, that his mother's life had been put at risk through negligence on the part of the staff of a State-run nursing home, that the police had not undertaken

In addition, none of their claims for compensation had yet been successful. Their prospects of receiving compensation appeared, for the time being, to be too remote to have any relevance.

These statements were consistent with the statements given by the other applicants.

In addition, witnesses M.H. and M.V., when questioned before the trial court, had retracted their pre-trial statements as being made under intimidation and ill-treatment by police officers during their

    The applicant complained that the admission of the pre-trial statements of M.S., D.T. and D.O., whom he had no opportunity to examine at his trial, amounted to a violation of his right to

In addition she was expelled from Sweden for five years. 11.

The Government state that she told the hospital staff that they had been caused by the applicant.

    On 6 November 2001 the applicant filed an amended statement of claim together with additional documents. 14.

The latter option was not possible since a trial could not be held without a previous statement, given at the investigation stage, from the person who was to be charged as a defendant.

and the judicial stage separately.