CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0315JUD003424805
15 mars 2016
1 to the Convention. III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE CONVENTION AND ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No.
Page 25 sur 799
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0612JUD002283218
12 juin 2025
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 of the Convention 7.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-110566
20 février 2012
The applicant complains under Article 3 of the Convention about the conditions of his detention.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0910REP001437988
10 septembre 1991
29. Between 29 March 1985 and 18 May 1988 the various persons remanded in custody filed altogether 25 requests for release from detention.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0419DEC005694111
19 avril 2016
The applicant complained under various Articles of the Convention about the authorities’ failure to provide her with a hearing aid free of charge.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1217JUD002485311
17 décembre 2015
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 TO THE CONVENTION 25.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-145158
26 mai 2014
Le droit du fils de la requérante à la vie, au sens de l’article 2 de la Convention, a-t-il été violé en l’espèce ?
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0929DEC004291205
29 septembre 2020
The applicants in applications nos. 42912/05 and 66710/09 also raised various complaints under Article 6 of the Convention, which, in so far as relevant, reads as follows: “In the determination
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-2436997-2631094
25 juillet 2008
Il invoque l’article 6 § 1 et 3 c) (droit à un procès équitable) de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme et l’article 4 du Protocole n o 7 (droit à ne pas être
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0305DEC000543605
5 mars 2013
Lastly, he made various other complaints under several Articles of the Convention. THE LAW A. The complaints under Article 5 of the Convention 37.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0430DEC001226507
30 avril 2013
The Government invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases pursuant to Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0929DEC003143108
29 septembre 2016
They further requested the Court to strike out the applications in accordance with Article 37 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0324DEC003693307
24 mars 2015
The applicants also made accessory complaints under various Articles of the Convention. THE LAW 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1001DEC001779804
1 octobre 2015
They relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 6 § 1 “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable
ECLI:CEDH:001-126484
30 août 2013
3 of Protocol No. 1, as required by Article 13 of the Convention?
ECLI:CEDH:001-177540
11 septembre 2017
Relying on Articles 10 and 13 of the Convention and Article 18 of the Convention in conjunction with Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention, they also complain that the imposition of travel bans
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0429DEC001757905
29 avril 2010
He further complained under Article 5 § 5 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the Convention that he had sustained a substantial loss of income on account of his detention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1115DEC000100704
15 novembre 2005
O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 20 December 2003, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410DEC004513106
10 avril 2012
Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0924DEC001234805
24 septembre 2019
They further submitted accessory complaints under Articles 3, 5, 6, 8, 13 of the Convention, as well as Article 4 of Protocol No. 7. THE LAW 5.