It raises issues under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) and (d) of the Convention.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 22.

Accordingly, the President of the Chamber appointed Ms Anna Margaryan to sit as an ad hoc judge (Article 26 § 4 of the Convention and Rule 29 § 1). THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6.

    The applicants complained under Articles 2 and 13 of the Convention of their son’s death and the authorities’ failure to investigate it effectively. 2.

14 read together with Article 8 of the Convention.

(violation of article 3) (see details in Appendix);   Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article

    Was the applicant subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment in breach of Article 3 of the Convention during his stay in the Odessa SIZO?

stipulates in its Article 4 that the General Convention shall apply to the UNV.

1315, devenu 1353, du code civil, ensemble les articles L. 141-1 du code de l'organisation judiciaire et 6, § 1, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l'homme et des libertés fondamentales ; 3

He invokes Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention.   2.

de 4% à compter du 05 août 2025 et le bénéfice de l’anatocisme en application de l’article 1343-2 du code civil ; > 2.461,08 euros (1.230,54€ x 2) à titre d’indemnité provisionnelle d’occupation à compter

    The Court observes in this connection that Article   6 §   1 of the Convention imposes on the Contracting States the duty to organise their legal systems in such a way that their

In view of the above, the Court is of the opinion that the applicant had available a remedy satisfying the requirements of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention.

Accordingly, the Court rejects them as manifestly ill-founded, pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. IV.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 44.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 15.

It therefore rejects this part of the application as manifestly ill-founded in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. II.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 16.

with Article 35   §   4.

its obligation under Article 34 of the Convention.