On 10 May 1985 the Bourg-en-Bresse Juvenile Assize Court sentenced him to six years’ imprisonment for armed robbery.

One of the applications was granted by the Bourges Court of Appeal on the ground, in particular, that “the adoption [was] in the child’s interests”, while the other was rejected by the Paris Court of Appeal

The Constitutional Court stated, inter alia , that the amount of the unjust enrichment should correspond to the amount of usual rent in the given place and time.

The Constitutional Court stated, inter alia , that the amount of the unjust enrichment should correspond to the amount of usual rent in the given place and time.

The applicant appealed on 25 September 1989 but, in an order of 3   October 1989, the President of the Indictment Division of the Bourges Court of Appeal refused him leave to appeal to that Division

The court noted, inter alia , that the Reviewing Authority’s conclusions as to the lack of credibility of the applicant’s claims mainly due to the existence of significant contradictions were reasonable

at no stage did he rely on the provisions of Article   14 § 2(f) of the Law no.1226-XIII on Pre-trial Detention (see paragraph 38 above) which prohibits in absolute terms the detention of, inter alia