It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 48390/19 Attila PAPP against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 40/18 István VIGH against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 27042/15 Mária CSURGAI against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 32010/18 Mária KISS and Roland Peter KISS-BERECZKI against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 6263/24 Róbert SURMAN against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 9423/24 Attila KUTKA against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 50782/15 Ilona KOVÁCS against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 55780/19 László GALAMBOS against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 46522/20 Imre Csaba KOVÁCS against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

SONERIU against Romania The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 8   December 2022 as a Committee composed of:   Armen Harutyunyan , President ,   Anja Seibert-Fohr

In view of the above, the Court finds that the applicant can no longer claim to be a victim of a violation of his rights under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

GERMANY   The European Court of Human Rights is holding a Grand Chamber [1] hearing today Wednesday 24 September 2008 at 9 a.m. , in the case of Mooren v. Germany (application no. 11364/03).