The wound did not have a clear shape and looked more like a star than a hole.

However, where it is clear from the outset that no effective remedy is available to the applicant, the period runs from the date of the acts or measures complained of.

However, such proof may follow from the co ‑ existence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact.

In particular, the roles of S.K. and Ye.P., as well as that of A.I., were sufficiently clear from the witness statements, identification parades and the fact that S.K. had been driving the Moskvich vehicle

Referring to Harkins and Edwards v. the United Kingdom (nos. 9146/07 and 32650/07, 17 January 2012), it found that, on the facts of the case, a sentence of life imprisonment was fully justified, and that

Instead, it is clear from the facts of the case that, during this period, the court had been dealing with the numerous interlocutory applications filed by the parties.

Edwards and Mr.   G. Underwood, advisers from the Home Office.   The applicant was represented by Mr.   J.P. Gardner, Solicitor, Mr.   J. Connolly, barrister at law, and Miss S.

To assess this evidence, the Court adopts the standard of proof “beyond reasonable doubt”, but adds that such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences

By separating these issues, the Federal Constitutional Court had made it clear that in its view, the applicant’s conditions of detention would not affect the lawfulness of her detention as such. 2.

    The court first pointed out that, at the time of the arrest, C.C. had displayed clear symptoms of drug intoxication.

explanation of how those injuries were caused and to produce evidence casting doubt on the victim's allegations, particularly if those allegations were corroborated by medical reports, failing which a clear

[previous judgments] make it clear that when the Brodrick Committee stated that one of the purposes of an inquest is ‘To allay rumours or suspicions’ this purpose should be confined to allaying rumours

Where it is clear from the outset however that no effective remedy is available to the applicant, the period runs from the date of the acts or measures complained of, or from the date of knowledge of that

Belgium , 22 April 1992, § 32, Series   A no. 235-B; Edwards v. the United Kingdom , 16 December 1992, §   34, Series A no. 247-B; Melnychuk v.

It is not clear who she was. 28.     On 22 September 2003 the investigation was suspended. 29.

However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact.

font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }  Application No. 13071/87   Derek EDWARDS

A defendant is entitled, as indeed have [the applicant and Walsh] made it perfectly clear they are entitled not to give evidence.

He had made no comment when asked questions by the police and made it clear to the Governor of the Prison shortly before the trial that he refused to provide a statement or give evidence.