CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

3 223 résultats pour « Foading-Nchoh »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0403DEC002551794

Admin. suprême

3 avril 1995

3 avril 1995

In addition, the applicant pointed out that it should not be presumed that the owners of pets would allow fouling of corridors.

Source officielle

Page 26 sur 162

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415DEC005245408

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2014

15 avril 2014

On 21 March 2006 the Şırnak Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office filed an indictment with the Şırnak Assize Court (“the court”) charging the applicants with bribery, forming an organized criminal group to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1109DEC003489197

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 1999

9 novembre 1999

  In addition, the second applicant complains under Articles 2 § 1 and 3 § 1 of Protocol No. 4 that the residence ban against his wife has the effect of forcing him either to renounce his marriage

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0513DEC001824291

Admin. suprême

13 mai 1992

13 mai 1992

P., on suspicion of forging documents and of fraud.         Between 17 April 1990 and 1 June 1990 the trial took place before the Sense District Court (Bezirksgericht).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0626DEC002301993

Admin. suprême

26 juin 1996

26 juin 1996

       On 9 February 1989 the preliminary investigations against the applicant were extended to include charges of forging documents (Urkundenfälschung) and of having surreptitiously

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-168249

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2016

5 octobre 2016

That court went on to say that “what was essential for this type of political activity [was] direct participation in the process of forming the bodies through which, according to the Constitution, the

Source officielle
CA

3ème chambre A

62da3e582eb797effb0703ac

Appel

21 juillet 2022

21 juillet 2022

Ainsi, elle a indiqué dans son courriel du 22 juin 2016, avoir organisé un déjeuner en 2013, avoir relancé ce propriétaire et avoir fait le forcing à sa demande auprès de la société Eiffage'; la société

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0111JUD007050213

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2018

11 janvier 2018

    On 19 September 2010 ninety-eight members of Ilinden held a founding meeting at which they resolved to form the organisation and apply to register it, adopted articles of association, and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9646

Admin. suprême

25 février 1993

25 février 1993

flagrantly unlawful act or sought compensation ( Crémieux case); Mr and Mrs Miailhe had not yet challenged, as they could at the outset of their criminal trial, the lawfulness of the customs' action forming

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10070

Admin. suprême

8 juin 1995

8 juin 1995

Danger of absconding: applicants had returned to Turkey of their own accord and with specific aim of founding Turkish United Communist Party - they could not have been unaware that they would be prosecuted

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4805

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2003

8 juillet 2003

In the present case, the domestic courts had held that a decision under section   1711 of the Civil Code depended on the circumstances and when reaching the conclusion that forcing the child to see

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0902DEC001460102

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2004

2 septembre 2004

He further alleged a violation of Article 3 § 1 of Protocol No. 4 in that his house had been destroyed with a view to forcing him to leave Croatia.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0330DEC003258096

Admin. suprême

30 mars 1999

30 mars 1999

The prosecution called for the applicant to be convicted and sentenced pursuant to Section 168 of the Turkish Criminal Code for founding or being a member of an armed organisation against the security

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1083

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2011

8 mars 2011

violation [This case was referred to the Grand Chamber on 15 September 2011] Facts – By deeds of gift inter vivos signed in 1994 the applicants became the owners of several plots of land on an island forming

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12640

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2019

31 octobre 2019

Although the parent applicants had been under no obligation to disclose their convictions, the fact that they had been required to submit a solemn declaration had amounted to forcing them to adopt behaviour

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-101053

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2010

15 septembre 2010

In 1991, the first applicant received a residence permit for the purposes of forming a family unit and working.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10834

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2016

28 janvier 2016

Since forming an association to express and promote its identity could be instrumental in helping a minority preserve and uphold its rights, this issue was linked to the question whether, under the Convention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-59

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2012

31 janvier 2012

The county court had based its refusal on the need to protect Christian Orthodox tradition, its founding dogmas and the rules of canon law governing decision-making, and on the finding that it was not

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2145

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2012

10 avril 2012

Control of the use of property Confiscation of property of an accused’s widow: no violation   Facts – The applicant’s husband M.S., who had been a high-ranking tax police officer, was charged with forming

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12941

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2020

6 octobre 2020

source, it was not sufficient to argue that, in the absence of such disclosure, it would not be possible to pursue a criminal investigation; account had to be taken of the seriousness of the offences forming

Source officielle